Symptom overlap on the srs‐2 adult self‐report between adults with asd and adults with high anxiety

Many people diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) also experience significant symptoms of anxiety, while many people with anxiety disorders likewise experience social difficulties. These concerns can be difficult to tease apart in general clinical settings. The Social Responsiveness Scale (S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Autism research 2017-07, Vol.10 (7), p.1215-1220
Hauptverfasser: South, Mikle, Carr, AnnaLisa W., Stephenson, Kevin G., Maisel, Max E., Cox, Jonathan C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Many people diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) also experience significant symptoms of anxiety, while many people with anxiety disorders likewise experience social difficulties. These concerns can be difficult to tease apart in general clinical settings. The Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) is one of the most frequently used measures of dimensional ASD symptoms. In order to investigate the overlap of autism and anxiety on the SRS, we compared three groups of adults (an ASD group, n = 40; a high anxious group, n = 56; and a typical comparison group, n = 29) using the new Adult Self Report version of the SRS‐2nd Edition (SRS‐2‐ASR) alongside a battery of anxiety questionnaires. Based on previous research with children from the parent‐report SRS (first edition), we hypothesized that the SRS‐2‐ASR would have difficulty discriminating between the ASD and high anxious groups. Results showed that both these clinical groups scored significantly higher on the SRS than a typical control group. Discriminant validity was poor, including sensitivity of 0.65 when including all participants and 0.48 when only the two clinical groups were included. In particular, the Social Motivation subscale of the SRS‐ASR failed to distinguish between ASD and anxiety groups. As recommended in the SRS‐2 manual, we highlight the need for caution when using the SRS‐2‐ASR to support diagnostic decision making, especially in clinical settings involving anxiety, ADHD, or other concerns that can affect reciprocal social communication and/or behavioral flexibility. Autism Res 2017. © 2017 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Autism Res 2017, 10: 1215–1220. © 2017 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN:1939-3792
1939-3806
DOI:10.1002/aur.1764