Comparison of cancer risk estimates based on a variety of risk assessment methodologies

The EPA guidelines recommend a benchmark dose as a point of departure (PoD) for low-dose cancer risk assessment. Generally the PoD is the lower 95% confidence limit on the dose estimated to produce an extra lifetime cancer risk of 10% (LTD 10). Due to the relatively narrow range of doses in two-year...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology 2003-02, Vol.37 (1), p.45-53
Hauptverfasser: Gold, Lois Swirsky, Gaylor, David W, Slone, Thomas H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The EPA guidelines recommend a benchmark dose as a point of departure (PoD) for low-dose cancer risk assessment. Generally the PoD is the lower 95% confidence limit on the dose estimated to produce an extra lifetime cancer risk of 10% (LTD 10). Due to the relatively narrow range of doses in two-year bioassays and the limited range of statistically significant tumor incidence rates, the estimate of the LTD 10 is constrained to a relatively narrow range of values. Because of this constraint, simple, quick estimates of the LTD 10 can be readily obtained for hundreds of rodent carcinogens from the Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB) of Gold et al. Three estimation procedures for LTD 10 are described, using increasing information from the CPDB: (A) based on only the maximum tolerated dose (the highest dose tested); (B) based on the TD 50; and (C) based on the TD 50 and its lower 99% confidence limit. As expected, results indicate overall similarity of the LTD 10 estimates and the value of using additional information. For Method (C) the estimator based on the [{(TD 50) 0.36×(LoConf) 0.64}/6.6] is generally similar to the estimator based on the one-hit model or multistage model LTD 10. This simple estimate of the LTD 10 is applicable for both linear and curved dose responses with high or low background tumor rates, and whether the confidence limits on the TD 50 are wide or tight. The EPA guidelines provide for a margin of exposure approach if data are sufficient to support a nonlinear dose–response. The reference dose for cancer for a nonlinear dose–response curve based on a 10,000-fold uncertainty (safety) factor from the LTD 10, i.e., the LTD 10/10,000, is mathematically equivalent to the value for a linear extrapolation from the LTD 10 to the dose corresponding to a cancer risk of
ISSN:0273-2300
1096-0295
DOI:10.1016/S0273-2300(02)00026-0