Attention in the representation of sequence: Experiment and theory

Cohen, Ivry and Keele (1990) showed that sequences of events involving some unique events could be learned in the presence of distraction and without awareness. In contrast, sequences in which all events are repeated in different orders in different parts of the sequence require attention. Cohen et...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human movement science 1992-02, Vol.11 (1), p.125-138
Hauptverfasser: Keele, Steven W., Jennings, Peggy J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cohen, Ivry and Keele (1990) showed that sequences of events involving some unique events could be learned in the presence of distraction and without awareness. In contrast, sequences in which all events are repeated in different orders in different parts of the sequence require attention. Cohen et al. hypothesized that the latter type of sequence requires division into parts and the assignment of representational codes in hierarchic fashion. These notions are tested in simulations involving a connectionist model developed by Jordan (1990).
ISSN:0167-9457
1872-7646
DOI:10.1016/0167-9457(92)90055-G