Comparison of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus capecitabine plus cisplatin as first‐line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer
Aim: It remains unclear whether capecitabine combined with cisplatin would show similar effects compared with standard therapy using gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Methods: Patients with advanced BTC who were treated with first‐line chemotherapy at Asan Medical Cen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology 2017-02, Vol.13 (1), p.13-20 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim: It remains unclear whether capecitabine combined with cisplatin would show similar effects compared with standard therapy using gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC).
Methods: Patients with advanced BTC who were treated with first‐line chemotherapy at Asan Medical Center were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received either cisplatin followed by gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (GP group), or capecitabine on days 1–14 with cisplatin on day 1 every 3 weeks (XP group).
Results: Of the 134 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 78 received XP and 56 were treated with GP. After a median follow‐up of 26.2 months, the progression‐free survival was 5.7 months for XP versus 4.1 months for GP (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81, P = 0.31). The overall survival (OS) was 11.0 months for XP versus 9.8 months for GP (HR = 0.84, P = 0.36). In the multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in PFS and OS between the two groups.
Conclusion: XP seems to be as effective as GP in patients with advanced BTC. The XP regimen is feasible and might offer increased convenience regarding the schedule of drug administration. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1743-7555 1743-7563 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ajco.12592 |