Effectiveness of pre-treatment with chlorhexidine in restoration retention: A 36-month follow-up randomized clinical trial

Abstract Objectives This study evaluated the effect of the pre-treatment with 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) as coadjutant in restoration retention of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL), after 36 months of follow-up. Methods A randomized controlled split-mouth and triple-blind (operators, patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dentistry 2017-05, Vol.60, p.44-49
Hauptverfasser: Favetti, Morgana, Schroeder, Thaiane, Montagner, Anelise Fernandes, Correa, Marcos Britto, Pereira-Cenci, Tatiana, Cenci, Maximiliano Sergio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objectives This study evaluated the effect of the pre-treatment with 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) as coadjutant in restoration retention of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL), after 36 months of follow-up. Methods A randomized controlled split-mouth and triple-blind (operators, patients and evaluator) trial was carried out. Patients ( n = 42) with at least two non-carious cervical lesions were included. The teeth with NCCL were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: application of 2% CHX (experimental group) or a placebo solution (control group) for 60 s after acid etching and before the adhesive application. A trained and calibrated examiner evaluated the restorations at baseline (1 week) and at each recall (6, 12, 24 and 36 months) using the FDI criteria. A total of 225 restorations were evaluated after 36-month follow-up. Data were subjected to survival analysis using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to evaluate the existence of differences between the survival curves ( α = 0.05). Results The restorations survival rate after 36 months of follow-up was 76.1%. There was no difference in the retention and failure rates between the experimental and the control group ( p = 0.968). There was an increased failure trend when restorations were located subgingival compared to those at the gingival level or supragingival. Conclusion The pre-treatment with 2% chlorhexidine digluconate did not promote further restoration retention of noncarious cervical lesions. Clinical significance The cavity pre-treatment with chlorhexidine for inhibition of hybrid layer degradation does not add any beneficial effect to the clinical performance of restorations.
ISSN:0300-5712
1879-176X
DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.014