Patient emotions and perceptions of antiepileptic drug changes and titration during treatment for epilepsy

Abstract Objective To investigate the impact of antiepileptic drug (AED) change and dose titration on the emotional well-being of patients with epilepsy. Methods Members of an online epilepsy community were invited to voluntarily participate in an online survey. The cross-sectional anonymous survey...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epilepsy & behavior 2017-04, Vol.69, p.44-52
Hauptverfasser: Fishman, Jesse, Cohen, Greg, Josephson, Colin, Collier, Ann Marie, Bharatham, Srikanth, Zhang, Ying, Wild, Imane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective To investigate the impact of antiepileptic drug (AED) change and dose titration on the emotional well-being of patients with epilepsy. Methods Members of an online epilepsy community were invited to voluntarily participate in an online survey. The cross-sectional anonymous survey consisted of 31 multiple choice questions balanced in terms of variety and positivity/negativity of emotions concerning participants' most recent AED change. To substantiate survey results, spontaneous comments from epilepsy-related online forums and social media websites that mentioned participants' experiences with AED medication changes (termed passive listening statements) were analyzed and categorized by theme. Results All 345 survey participants (270 [78.3%] female; 172 [49.9%] were 26–45 years old) self-reported an epilepsy/seizure diagnosis and were currently taking seizure medication; 263 (76.2%) were taking ≥ 2 AEDs and 301 (87.2%) had ≥ 1 seizure in the previous 18 months. All participants reported a medication change within the previous 12 months (dose increased [153 participants (44.3%)], medication added [105 (30.4%)], dose decreased [49 (14.2%)], medication removed [38 (11.0%)]). Improving seizure control (247 [71.6%]) and adverse events (109 [31.6%]) were the most common reasons for medication change. Primary emotions most associated (≥ 10% of participants) with an AED regimen change were (before medication change; during/after medication change) hopefulness (50 [14.5%]; 43 [12.5%]), uncertainty (50 [14.5%]; 69 [20.0%]), and anxiety (35 [10.1%]; 45 [13.0%]), and were largely due to concerns whether the change would work (212/345 [61.4%]; 180/345 [52.2%]). In the text analysis segment aimed at validating the survey, 230 participants' passive listening statements about medication titration were analyzed; additional seizure activity during dose titration (93 [40.4%]), adverse events during titration (71 [30.9%]), higher medication dosages (33 [14.3%]), and drug costs (25 [10.9%]) were the most commonly noted concerns. Conclusion Although the emotional well-being of patients with epilepsy is complex, our study results suggest that participants report their emotional well-being as negatively affected by changes in AED regimen, with most patients reporting uncertainty regarding the outcome of such a change. Future research is warranted to explore approaches to alleviate patient concerns associated with AED medication changes.
ISSN:1525-5050
1525-5069
DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.01.032