Cerebellar Control of Constrained and Unconstrained Movements. II. EMG and Nuclear Activity
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 Goodkin, H. P. and W. T. Thach. Cerebellar Control of Constrained and Unconstrained Movements. II. EMG and Nuclear Activity. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 896-908, 2003. The aim of this study was to se...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurophysiology 2003-02, Vol.89 (2), p.896-908 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University
School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Goodkin, H. P. and
W. T. Thach.
Cerebellar Control of Constrained and Unconstrained
Movements. II. EMG and Nuclear Activity. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 896-908, 2003. The aim of this study was to see in
monkeys if neurons in dentate and lateral interposed deep cerebellar
nuclei are preferentially active in relation to certain movements
relative to others. Simple and compound digit movements were trained
with digits, hand, and elbow constrained in a cast. The
constrained simple movement was flexion of Thumb or Index; the
constrained compound movement, flexion of Thumb+Index. An unconstrained
compound movement consisted of a reach to, pinch of, and retrieval of a
small food reward (Reach+Pinch). Electromyographic (EMG) recording
showed that many muscles in the upper extremity, shoulder girdle, and
trunk were active in all movements. EMG/muscle stimulation during the
constrained digit movements showed that the digit prime movers were
active during, sufficient for, and necessary for performance of these digit tasks. By contrast, EMG/muscle stimulation showed that the proximal muscles (though co-active during the tasks) were neither sufficient nor necessary for performance of the digit tasks. A fraction
of those neurons that were active during both the constrained and the
unconstrained movements fired at a higher frequency during the
unconstrained task. Some neurons were active during Reach+Pinch only; a
few others were active during one or more of Thumb, Index, Thumb+Index
only. There was no distinct preferential discharge relationship to the
compound Thumb+Index as compared with the simple Thumb or Index. These
correlational data are consistent with an interpretation that the
cerebellar discharge influenced all of these movements simple and
compound, constrained, and unconstrained no one type seemingly more
than any other. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
DOI: | 10.1152/jn.00115.2002 |