Peritoneal Metastases from Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Incidence, Risk Factors and Prognosis
Background Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rare neoplasms and data on peritoneal metastases (PM) from these tumors are scarce. Objective The aim of this study was to present population-based data on the incidence, risk factors, and survival of synchronous PM in GEP-NETs....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2017-08, Vol.24 (8), p.2199-2205 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rare neoplasms and data on peritoneal metastases (PM) from these tumors are scarce.
Objective
The aim of this study was to present population-based data on the incidence, risk factors, and survival of synchronous PM in GEP-NETs.
Methods
Data from all patients diagnosed with a GEP-NET during 2007–2013 were collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Age-standardized incidence rates were calculated and risk factors for developing PM were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Survival was investigated using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses.
Results
A total of 4114 patients were diagnosed with a GEP-NET. PM were diagnosed in 234 patients (19% of patients with metastasized disease, representing 6% of all GEP-NETs). The incidence of patients diagnosed with PM was 1.6:1,000,000 persons per year. Risk factors for developing PM were higher age (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% CI 1.0–2.0) and primary tumor location in the small intestine (OR 3.5, 95% CI 2.1–5.7) or colon (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4–4.4). Small intestinal NETs with PM had the best survival, while appendiceal NETs with PM had the poorest survival (5-year survival rates of 67 and 7%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that survival in patients with PM was worse compared with patients without metastases; however, the presence of PM among all metastasized patients was not associated with worse survival.
Conclusions
This nationwide population-based study provides relevant insight into the incidence and risk factors of PM in GEP-NETs, and reveals detailed site-specific data on the presence of PM and survival data that may contribute to develop individualized treatment strategies in patients with these heterogeneous neoplasms. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
DOI: | 10.1245/s10434-016-5734-x |