On-Treatment Analysis of the Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT)

Abstract Background We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of adding ezetimibe (Ez) to simvastatin (S) in a post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) population in a prespecified on-treatment analysis. Methods We evaluated 17,706 post-ACS patients from the IMPROVE-IT trial who had low-density lipopr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American heart journal 2016-12, Vol.182, p.89-96
Hauptverfasser: Blazing, Michael A., MD, Giugliano, Robert P., MD, SM, de Lemos, James A., MD, Cannon, Christopher P., MD, Tonkin, Andrew, MBBS, MD, Ballantyne, Christie M., MD, Lewis, Basil S., MD, Musliner, Thomas A., MD, Tershakovec, Andrew M., MD, MPH, Lokhnygina, Yuliya, PhD, White, Jennifer A., MS, Reist, Craig, PhD, McCagg, Amy, BS, Braunwald, Eugene, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of adding ezetimibe (Ez) to simvastatin (S) in a post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) population in a prespecified on-treatment analysis. Methods We evaluated 17,706 post-ACS patients from the IMPROVE-IT trial who had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values between 50 and 125 mg/dL and who received Ez 10 mg/day with S 40 mg/day (Ez/S) or placebo with simvastatin 40 mg/day (P/S). The primary composite endpoint was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary revascularization ≥30 days post randomization, or stroke. The on-treatment analysis included patients who received study drug for the duration of the trial or experienced a primary endpoint or non-cardiovascular death within 30 days of drug discontinuation. Results Mean LDL-C values at 1 year were 71 mg/dL for P/S and 54 mg/dL for Ez/S (absolute difference− 17 mg/dL = −24%; P < .001). The 7-year Kaplan–Meier estimate of the primary endpoint occurred in 32.4% in the P/S arm and 29.8% in the Ez/S arm (absolute difference 2.6%; HRadj 0.92 [95% CI 0.87–0.98]; P = .01). The absolute treatment effect favoring Ez/S was 30% greater than in the intention-to-treat analysis of IMPROVE-IT. Conclusions This analysis provides additional support for the efficacy and safety of adding Ez to S in this high-risk, post-ACS population.
ISSN:0002-8703
1097-6744
DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2016.09.004