A comparison of three different surgical procedures in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures: a randomized controlled trial

Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of three different surgical procedures in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures. Materials and methods Between September 2012 and January 2015, a total of 90 patients with type A thoracolumbar fractures were randomly assigned into t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International orthopaedics 2016-06, Vol.40 (6), p.1233-1238
Hauptverfasser: Lyu, Jianhua, Chen, Kai, Tang, Zhaohui, Chen, Yu, Li, Ming, Zhang, Qiulin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1238
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1233
container_title International orthopaedics
container_volume 40
creator Lyu, Jianhua
Chen, Kai
Tang, Zhaohui
Chen, Yu
Li, Ming
Zhang, Qiulin
description Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of three different surgical procedures in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures. Materials and methods Between September 2012 and January 2015, a total of 90 patients with type A thoracolumbar fractures were randomly assigned into three groups of 30 each. Patients in group A, B, and C were treated with three-level percutaneous fixation, two-level percutaneous fixation, and three-level open fixation, respectively. Blood loss, duration of surgery, VAS scores, Cobb angles, and anterior height ratios of fractured vertebrae were collected for statistical analysis. Results The average follow-up was 17.7 months. Post-operative Cobb angles were significantly corrected and anterior height ratios of fractured vertebrae were well restored in all three groups ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00264-016-3129-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868314355</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1868314355</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-c65ba38ca53438309120dfbc540b9a00ce2d08b379ebb6ac67ad3ba5f73fe12b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv3CAQhVHVqNlu-gNyiTjm4hSMwbi3VZQ2lSL1kpwR4CF1ZJvtgA_Ze_53sDbtMT0xGr73BuYRcs7ZFWes_ZoYq1VTMa4qweuuOnwgG96IupK8kx_JhomGV7Xq5Cn5nNITY7xVmn8ip6XHWt2qDXnZUR-nvcUhxZnGQPNvBKD9EAIgzJmmBR8Hb0e6x-ihXxASHeaCAc0INk8rtOqe90B3pR_R-jguk7NIQ6nzKvlGLUU793EaDtCXkXPGOI6lzDjY8YycBDsm-PJ2bsnD95v769vq7tePn9e7u8o3WuXKK-ms0N5K0QgtWMdr1gfnZcNcZxnzUPdMO9F24JyyXrW2F87K0IoAvHZiSy6PvuUzfxZI2UxD8jCOdoa4JMO10qJsUMr_o20nteK6vGRL-BH1GFNCCGaPw2Tx2XBm1qDMMShTgjJrUOZQNBdv9ouboP-n-JtMAeojkMrV_AhonuKCc9nOO66vNk-heA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1795861834</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of three different surgical procedures in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures: a randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Lyu, Jianhua ; Chen, Kai ; Tang, Zhaohui ; Chen, Yu ; Li, Ming ; Zhang, Qiulin</creator><creatorcontrib>Lyu, Jianhua ; Chen, Kai ; Tang, Zhaohui ; Chen, Yu ; Li, Ming ; Zhang, Qiulin</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of three different surgical procedures in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures. Materials and methods Between September 2012 and January 2015, a total of 90 patients with type A thoracolumbar fractures were randomly assigned into three groups of 30 each. Patients in group A, B, and C were treated with three-level percutaneous fixation, two-level percutaneous fixation, and three-level open fixation, respectively. Blood loss, duration of surgery, VAS scores, Cobb angles, and anterior height ratios of fractured vertebrae were collected for statistical analysis. Results The average follow-up was 17.7 months. Post-operative Cobb angles were significantly corrected and anterior height ratios of fractured vertebrae were well restored in all three groups ( p  &lt; 0.01). Back pain was efficiently relieved according to VAS score change ( p  &lt; 0.01). There were significant differences in values of blood loss and post-operative VAS scores (at three months) between group A and group C ( p  &lt; 0.01). No significant difference concerning post-operative anterior height ratios of fractured vertebrae, Cobb angles and correction losses was observed between group A and group B ( p  = 0.580, 0.840, 0.215, respectively). Conclusion Percutaneous fixation not only provides the same reduction effect as open fixation, but also has an advantage of causing less operation related trauma which is beneficial to post-operative rehabilitation. The efficacy of three-level percutaneous fixation and two-level percutaneous fixation in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures is not significantly different.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0341-2695</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5195</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3129-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26907876</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Back Pain ; Bone Screws ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Original Paper ; Orthopedics ; Postoperative Period ; Spinal Fractures - surgery ; Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>International orthopaedics, 2016-06, Vol.40 (6), p.1233-1238</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-c65ba38ca53438309120dfbc540b9a00ce2d08b379ebb6ac67ad3ba5f73fe12b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-c65ba38ca53438309120dfbc540b9a00ce2d08b379ebb6ac67ad3ba5f73fe12b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00264-016-3129-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00264-016-3129-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26907876$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lyu, Jianhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Zhaohui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qiulin</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of three different surgical procedures in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures: a randomized controlled trial</title><title>International orthopaedics</title><addtitle>International Orthopaedics (SICOT)</addtitle><addtitle>Int Orthop</addtitle><description>Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of three different surgical procedures in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures. Materials and methods Between September 2012 and January 2015, a total of 90 patients with type A thoracolumbar fractures were randomly assigned into three groups of 30 each. Patients in group A, B, and C were treated with three-level percutaneous fixation, two-level percutaneous fixation, and three-level open fixation, respectively. Blood loss, duration of surgery, VAS scores, Cobb angles, and anterior height ratios of fractured vertebrae were collected for statistical analysis. Results The average follow-up was 17.7 months. Post-operative Cobb angles were significantly corrected and anterior height ratios of fractured vertebrae were well restored in all three groups ( p  &lt; 0.01). Back pain was efficiently relieved according to VAS score change ( p  &lt; 0.01). There were significant differences in values of blood loss and post-operative VAS scores (at three months) between group A and group C ( p  &lt; 0.01). No significant difference concerning post-operative anterior height ratios of fractured vertebrae, Cobb angles and correction losses was observed between group A and group B ( p  = 0.580, 0.840, 0.215, respectively). Conclusion Percutaneous fixation not only provides the same reduction effect as open fixation, but also has an advantage of causing less operation related trauma which is beneficial to post-operative rehabilitation. The efficacy of three-level percutaneous fixation and two-level percutaneous fixation in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures is not significantly different.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Back Pain</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Spinal Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0341-2695</issn><issn>1432-5195</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv3CAQhVHVqNlu-gNyiTjm4hSMwbi3VZQ2lSL1kpwR4CF1ZJvtgA_Ze_53sDbtMT0xGr73BuYRcs7ZFWes_ZoYq1VTMa4qweuuOnwgG96IupK8kx_JhomGV7Xq5Cn5nNITY7xVmn8ip6XHWt2qDXnZUR-nvcUhxZnGQPNvBKD9EAIgzJmmBR8Hb0e6x-ihXxASHeaCAc0INk8rtOqe90B3pR_R-jguk7NIQ6nzKvlGLUU793EaDtCXkXPGOI6lzDjY8YycBDsm-PJ2bsnD95v769vq7tePn9e7u8o3WuXKK-ms0N5K0QgtWMdr1gfnZcNcZxnzUPdMO9F24JyyXrW2F87K0IoAvHZiSy6PvuUzfxZI2UxD8jCOdoa4JMO10qJsUMr_o20nteK6vGRL-BH1GFNCCGaPw2Tx2XBm1qDMMShTgjJrUOZQNBdv9ouboP-n-JtMAeojkMrV_AhonuKCc9nOO66vNk-heA</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Lyu, Jianhua</creator><creator>Chen, Kai</creator><creator>Tang, Zhaohui</creator><creator>Chen, Yu</creator><creator>Li, Ming</creator><creator>Zhang, Qiulin</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QP</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>A comparison of three different surgical procedures in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures: a randomized controlled trial</title><author>Lyu, Jianhua ; Chen, Kai ; Tang, Zhaohui ; Chen, Yu ; Li, Ming ; Zhang, Qiulin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-c65ba38ca53438309120dfbc540b9a00ce2d08b379ebb6ac67ad3ba5f73fe12b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Back Pain</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Spinal Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lyu, Jianhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Zhaohui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qiulin</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lyu, Jianhua</au><au>Chen, Kai</au><au>Tang, Zhaohui</au><au>Chen, Yu</au><au>Li, Ming</au><au>Zhang, Qiulin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of three different surgical procedures in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures: a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>International orthopaedics</jtitle><stitle>International Orthopaedics (SICOT)</stitle><addtitle>Int Orthop</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1233</spage><epage>1238</epage><pages>1233-1238</pages><issn>0341-2695</issn><eissn>1432-5195</eissn><abstract>Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of three different surgical procedures in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures. Materials and methods Between September 2012 and January 2015, a total of 90 patients with type A thoracolumbar fractures were randomly assigned into three groups of 30 each. Patients in group A, B, and C were treated with three-level percutaneous fixation, two-level percutaneous fixation, and three-level open fixation, respectively. Blood loss, duration of surgery, VAS scores, Cobb angles, and anterior height ratios of fractured vertebrae were collected for statistical analysis. Results The average follow-up was 17.7 months. Post-operative Cobb angles were significantly corrected and anterior height ratios of fractured vertebrae were well restored in all three groups ( p  &lt; 0.01). Back pain was efficiently relieved according to VAS score change ( p  &lt; 0.01). There were significant differences in values of blood loss and post-operative VAS scores (at three months) between group A and group C ( p  &lt; 0.01). No significant difference concerning post-operative anterior height ratios of fractured vertebrae, Cobb angles and correction losses was observed between group A and group B ( p  = 0.580, 0.840, 0.215, respectively). Conclusion Percutaneous fixation not only provides the same reduction effect as open fixation, but also has an advantage of causing less operation related trauma which is beneficial to post-operative rehabilitation. The efficacy of three-level percutaneous fixation and two-level percutaneous fixation in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures is not significantly different.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>26907876</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00264-016-3129-z</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0341-2695
ispartof International orthopaedics, 2016-06, Vol.40 (6), p.1233-1238
issn 0341-2695
1432-5195
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868314355
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Back Pain
Bone Screws
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects
Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods
Original Paper
Orthopedics
Postoperative Period
Spinal Fractures - surgery
Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery
Treatment Outcome
title A comparison of three different surgical procedures in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures: a randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T04%3A20%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20three%20different%20surgical%20procedures%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20type%20A%20thoracolumbar%20fractures:%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=International%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Lyu,%20Jianhua&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1233&rft.epage=1238&rft.pages=1233-1238&rft.issn=0341-2695&rft.eissn=1432-5195&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00264-016-3129-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1868314355%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1795861834&rft_id=info:pmid/26907876&rfr_iscdi=true