A comparison of three different surgical procedures in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures: a randomized controlled trial
Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of three different surgical procedures in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures. Materials and methods Between September 2012 and January 2015, a total of 90 patients with type A thoracolumbar fractures were randomly assigned into t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International orthopaedics 2016-06, Vol.40 (6), p.1233-1238 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of three different surgical procedures in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures.
Materials and methods
Between September 2012 and January 2015, a total of 90 patients with type A thoracolumbar fractures were randomly assigned into three groups of 30 each. Patients in group A, B, and C were treated with three-level percutaneous fixation, two-level percutaneous fixation, and three-level open fixation, respectively. Blood loss, duration of surgery, VAS scores, Cobb angles, and anterior height ratios of fractured vertebrae were collected for statistical analysis.
Results
The average follow-up was 17.7 months. Post-operative Cobb angles were significantly corrected and anterior height ratios of fractured vertebrae were well restored in all three groups (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0341-2695 1432-5195 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00264-016-3129-z |