Is radical surgery necessary in all patients who do not meet the curative criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection in early gastric cancer? A multi-center retrospective study in Japan

Background Although radical surgery is routinely performed for patients who do not meet the curative criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) due to the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM), this standard therapeutic option may be excessive given the lower nu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology 2017-02, Vol.52 (2), p.175-184
Hauptverfasser: Hatta, Waku, Gotoda, Takuji, Oyama, Tsuneo, Kawata, Noboru, Takahashi, Akiko, Yoshifuku, Yoshikazu, Hoteya, Shu, Nakamura, Koki, Hirano, Masaaki, Esaki, Mitsuru, Matsuda, Mitsuru, Ohnita, Ken, Shimoda, Ryo, Yoshida, Motoyuki, Dohi, Osamu, Takada, Jun, Tanaka, Keiko, Yamada, Shinya, Tsuji, Tsuyotoshi, Ito, Hirotaka, Hayashi, Yoshiaki, Nakamura, Tomohiro, Shimosegawa, Tooru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Although radical surgery is routinely performed for patients who do not meet the curative criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) due to the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM), this standard therapeutic option may be excessive given the lower number of patients with LNM. Therefore, we aimed to investigate long-term outcomes and validate risk factors predicting recurrence after ESD. Methods Of 15,785 patients who underwent ESD for EGC at 19 institutions between 2000 and 2011, 1969 patients not meeting the curative criteria were included in this multi-center study. Based on the treatment strategy after ESD, patients were divided into radical surgery ( n  = 1064) and follow-up (no additional treatment, n  = 905) groups. Results Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were significantly higher in the radical surgery group than in the follow-up group ( p  
ISSN:0944-1174
1435-5922
DOI:10.1007/s00535-016-1210-4