Glenoid version and size: does gender, ethnicity, or body size play a role?
Introduction Variations in glenoid morphology among patients of different gender, body habitus, and ethnicity have been of interest for surgeons. Understanding these anatomical variations is a critical step in restoring normal glenohumeral structure during shoulder reconstruction surgery. Methods Re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International orthopaedics 2016-11, Vol.40 (11), p.2347-2353 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2353 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2347 |
container_title | International orthopaedics |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Piponov, Hristo Ivanov Savin, David Shah, Neal Esposito, Domenic Schwartz, Brian Moretti, Vincent Goldberg, Benjamin |
description | Introduction
Variations in glenoid morphology among patients of different gender, body habitus, and ethnicity have been of interest for surgeons. Understanding these anatomical variations is a critical step in restoring normal glenohumeral structure during shoulder reconstruction surgery.
Methods
Retrospective review of 108 patient shoulder CT scans was performed and glenoid version, AP diameter and height were measured. Statistical multiple regression models were used to investigate the ability of gender and ethnicity to predict glenoid AP diameter, height, and version independently of patient weight and height.
Results
The mean glenoid AP diameter was 24.7 ± 3.5, the mean glenoid height was 31.7 ± 3.7, and the mean glenoid version was 0.05 ± 9.05. According to our regression models, males would be expected to exhibit 8.4° more glenoid retroversion than females (
p
= 0.003) and have 2.9 mm larger glenoid height compared to females (
p
= 0.002). The predicted male glenoid AP diameter was 3.4 mm higher than that in females (
p
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00264-016-3201-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868307108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1868307108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p217t-4a36b1f76caf05befad45afc2d0061f3a6b82f0dafa8d17c7707b785cfb324df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkbFOwzAURS0EoqXwASzII0MD79mJ7bIgVEFBVGKB2XJiu6RK42KnSOXrSSnsTHd4R0-69xByjnCFAPI6ATCRZ4Ai4wwwUwdkiDlnWYGT4pAMgeeYMTEpBuQkpSUASqHwmAyYRBAM8yF5njWuDbWlny6mOrTUtJam-svdUBtcogvXWhfH1HXvbV3V3XZMQ6RlsNsfiq4bs6WGxtC421Ny5E2T3Nlvjsjbw_3r9DGbv8yepnfzbM1QdlluuCjRS1EZD0XpvLF5YXzFLIBAz40oFfNgjTfKoqykBFlKVVS-5Cy3no_I5f7vOoaPjUudXtWpck1jWhc2SaMSikNfUf0DZULIvFCiRy9-0U25clavY70ycav_tuoBtgdSf2oXLupl2MS2b6oR9E6I3gvRvRC9E6IV_waXZHqR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826674586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glenoid version and size: does gender, ethnicity, or body size play a role?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Piponov, Hristo Ivanov ; Savin, David ; Shah, Neal ; Esposito, Domenic ; Schwartz, Brian ; Moretti, Vincent ; Goldberg, Benjamin</creator><creatorcontrib>Piponov, Hristo Ivanov ; Savin, David ; Shah, Neal ; Esposito, Domenic ; Schwartz, Brian ; Moretti, Vincent ; Goldberg, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Variations in glenoid morphology among patients of different gender, body habitus, and ethnicity have been of interest for surgeons. Understanding these anatomical variations is a critical step in restoring normal glenohumeral structure during shoulder reconstruction surgery.
Methods
Retrospective review of 108 patient shoulder CT scans was performed and glenoid version, AP diameter and height were measured. Statistical multiple regression models were used to investigate the ability of gender and ethnicity to predict glenoid AP diameter, height, and version independently of patient weight and height.
Results
The mean glenoid AP diameter was 24.7 ± 3.5, the mean glenoid height was 31.7 ± 3.7, and the mean glenoid version was 0.05 ± 9.05. According to our regression models, males would be expected to exhibit 8.4° more glenoid retroversion than females (
p
= 0.003) and have 2.9 mm larger glenoid height compared to females (
p
= 0.002). The predicted male glenoid AP diameter was 3.4 mm higher than that in females (
p
< 0.001). Hispanics demonstrated 6.4° more glenoid anteversion compared to African-Americans (
p
= 0.04). Asians exhibited 4.1 mm smaller glenoid AP diameters than African-Americans (
p
= 0.002). An increase of 25 kg in patient weight resulted in 1 mm increase in AP diameter (
p
= 0.01).
Conclusions
Gender is the strongest independent predictor of glenoid size and version. Males exhibited a larger size and more retroverted glenoid. Patient height was found to be predictive of glenoid size only in patients of the same gender. Although variations in glenoid size and version are observed among ethnicities, larger sample size ethnic groups will be necessary to explore the precise relations. Surgeons should consider gender and ethnic variations in the pre-operative planning and surgical restoration of the native glenohumeral relationship.
Level of Evidence: Anatomic Study</description><identifier>ISSN: 0341-2695</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5195</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3201-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27106214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anthropometry ; Bone Malalignment - diagnostic imaging ; Bone Malalignment - ethnology ; Bone Malalignment - pathology ; Female ; Glenoid Cavity - anatomy & histology ; Glenoid Cavity - pathology ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Original Paper ; Orthopedics ; Retrospective Studies ; Scapula - anatomy & histology ; Scapula - diagnostic imaging ; Scapula - pathology ; Sex Factors ; Shoulder Joint - anatomy & histology ; Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Shoulder Joint - pathology ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>International orthopaedics, 2016-11, Vol.40 (11), p.2347-2353</ispartof><rights>SICOT aisbl 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-p217t-4a36b1f76caf05befad45afc2d0061f3a6b82f0dafa8d17c7707b785cfb324df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00264-016-3201-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00264-016-3201-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27106214$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piponov, Hristo Ivanov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savin, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Neal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esposito, Domenic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moretti, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><title>Glenoid version and size: does gender, ethnicity, or body size play a role?</title><title>International orthopaedics</title><addtitle>International Orthopaedics (SICOT)</addtitle><addtitle>Int Orthop</addtitle><description>Introduction
Variations in glenoid morphology among patients of different gender, body habitus, and ethnicity have been of interest for surgeons. Understanding these anatomical variations is a critical step in restoring normal glenohumeral structure during shoulder reconstruction surgery.
Methods
Retrospective review of 108 patient shoulder CT scans was performed and glenoid version, AP diameter and height were measured. Statistical multiple regression models were used to investigate the ability of gender and ethnicity to predict glenoid AP diameter, height, and version independently of patient weight and height.
Results
The mean glenoid AP diameter was 24.7 ± 3.5, the mean glenoid height was 31.7 ± 3.7, and the mean glenoid version was 0.05 ± 9.05. According to our regression models, males would be expected to exhibit 8.4° more glenoid retroversion than females (
p
= 0.003) and have 2.9 mm larger glenoid height compared to females (
p
= 0.002). The predicted male glenoid AP diameter was 3.4 mm higher than that in females (
p
< 0.001). Hispanics demonstrated 6.4° more glenoid anteversion compared to African-Americans (
p
= 0.04). Asians exhibited 4.1 mm smaller glenoid AP diameters than African-Americans (
p
= 0.002). An increase of 25 kg in patient weight resulted in 1 mm increase in AP diameter (
p
= 0.01).
Conclusions
Gender is the strongest independent predictor of glenoid size and version. Males exhibited a larger size and more retroverted glenoid. Patient height was found to be predictive of glenoid size only in patients of the same gender. Although variations in glenoid size and version are observed among ethnicities, larger sample size ethnic groups will be necessary to explore the precise relations. Surgeons should consider gender and ethnic variations in the pre-operative planning and surgical restoration of the native glenohumeral relationship.
Level of Evidence: Anatomic Study</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Bone Malalignment - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bone Malalignment - ethnology</subject><subject>Bone Malalignment - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glenoid Cavity - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Glenoid Cavity - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Scapula - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Scapula - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Scapula - pathology</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - pathology</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0341-2695</issn><issn>1432-5195</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkbFOwzAURS0EoqXwASzII0MD79mJ7bIgVEFBVGKB2XJiu6RK42KnSOXrSSnsTHd4R0-69xByjnCFAPI6ATCRZ4Ai4wwwUwdkiDlnWYGT4pAMgeeYMTEpBuQkpSUASqHwmAyYRBAM8yF5njWuDbWlny6mOrTUtJam-svdUBtcogvXWhfH1HXvbV3V3XZMQ6RlsNsfiq4bs6WGxtC421Ny5E2T3Nlvjsjbw_3r9DGbv8yepnfzbM1QdlluuCjRS1EZD0XpvLF5YXzFLIBAz40oFfNgjTfKoqykBFlKVVS-5Cy3no_I5f7vOoaPjUudXtWpck1jWhc2SaMSikNfUf0DZULIvFCiRy9-0U25clavY70ycav_tuoBtgdSf2oXLupl2MS2b6oR9E6I3gvRvRC9E6IV_waXZHqR</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Piponov, Hristo Ivanov</creator><creator>Savin, David</creator><creator>Shah, Neal</creator><creator>Esposito, Domenic</creator><creator>Schwartz, Brian</creator><creator>Moretti, Vincent</creator><creator>Goldberg, Benjamin</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QP</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Glenoid version and size: does gender, ethnicity, or body size play a role?</title><author>Piponov, Hristo Ivanov ; Savin, David ; Shah, Neal ; Esposito, Domenic ; Schwartz, Brian ; Moretti, Vincent ; Goldberg, Benjamin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p217t-4a36b1f76caf05befad45afc2d0061f3a6b82f0dafa8d17c7707b785cfb324df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Bone Malalignment - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bone Malalignment - ethnology</topic><topic>Bone Malalignment - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glenoid Cavity - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Glenoid Cavity - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Scapula - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Scapula - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Scapula - pathology</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - pathology</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piponov, Hristo Ivanov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savin, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Neal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esposito, Domenic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moretti, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piponov, Hristo Ivanov</au><au>Savin, David</au><au>Shah, Neal</au><au>Esposito, Domenic</au><au>Schwartz, Brian</au><au>Moretti, Vincent</au><au>Goldberg, Benjamin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glenoid version and size: does gender, ethnicity, or body size play a role?</atitle><jtitle>International orthopaedics</jtitle><stitle>International Orthopaedics (SICOT)</stitle><addtitle>Int Orthop</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2347</spage><epage>2353</epage><pages>2347-2353</pages><issn>0341-2695</issn><eissn>1432-5195</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Variations in glenoid morphology among patients of different gender, body habitus, and ethnicity have been of interest for surgeons. Understanding these anatomical variations is a critical step in restoring normal glenohumeral structure during shoulder reconstruction surgery.
Methods
Retrospective review of 108 patient shoulder CT scans was performed and glenoid version, AP diameter and height were measured. Statistical multiple regression models were used to investigate the ability of gender and ethnicity to predict glenoid AP diameter, height, and version independently of patient weight and height.
Results
The mean glenoid AP diameter was 24.7 ± 3.5, the mean glenoid height was 31.7 ± 3.7, and the mean glenoid version was 0.05 ± 9.05. According to our regression models, males would be expected to exhibit 8.4° more glenoid retroversion than females (
p
= 0.003) and have 2.9 mm larger glenoid height compared to females (
p
= 0.002). The predicted male glenoid AP diameter was 3.4 mm higher than that in females (
p
< 0.001). Hispanics demonstrated 6.4° more glenoid anteversion compared to African-Americans (
p
= 0.04). Asians exhibited 4.1 mm smaller glenoid AP diameters than African-Americans (
p
= 0.002). An increase of 25 kg in patient weight resulted in 1 mm increase in AP diameter (
p
= 0.01).
Conclusions
Gender is the strongest independent predictor of glenoid size and version. Males exhibited a larger size and more retroverted glenoid. Patient height was found to be predictive of glenoid size only in patients of the same gender. Although variations in glenoid size and version are observed among ethnicities, larger sample size ethnic groups will be necessary to explore the precise relations. Surgeons should consider gender and ethnic variations in the pre-operative planning and surgical restoration of the native glenohumeral relationship.
Level of Evidence: Anatomic Study</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27106214</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00264-016-3201-8</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0341-2695 |
ispartof | International orthopaedics, 2016-11, Vol.40 (11), p.2347-2353 |
issn | 0341-2695 1432-5195 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868307108 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Aged Anthropometry Bone Malalignment - diagnostic imaging Bone Malalignment - ethnology Bone Malalignment - pathology Female Glenoid Cavity - anatomy & histology Glenoid Cavity - pathology Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Original Paper Orthopedics Retrospective Studies Scapula - anatomy & histology Scapula - diagnostic imaging Scapula - pathology Sex Factors Shoulder Joint - anatomy & histology Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging Shoulder Joint - pathology Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
title | Glenoid version and size: does gender, ethnicity, or body size play a role? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A52%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glenoid%20version%20and%20size:%20does%20gender,%20ethnicity,%20or%20body%20size%20play%20a%20role?&rft.jtitle=International%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Piponov,%20Hristo%20Ivanov&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2347&rft.epage=2353&rft.pages=2347-2353&rft.issn=0341-2695&rft.eissn=1432-5195&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00264-016-3201-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1868307108%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826674586&rft_id=info:pmid/27106214&rfr_iscdi=true |