Glenoid version and size: does gender, ethnicity, or body size play a role?
Introduction Variations in glenoid morphology among patients of different gender, body habitus, and ethnicity have been of interest for surgeons. Understanding these anatomical variations is a critical step in restoring normal glenohumeral structure during shoulder reconstruction surgery. Methods Re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International orthopaedics 2016-11, Vol.40 (11), p.2347-2353 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
Variations in glenoid morphology among patients of different gender, body habitus, and ethnicity have been of interest for surgeons. Understanding these anatomical variations is a critical step in restoring normal glenohumeral structure during shoulder reconstruction surgery.
Methods
Retrospective review of 108 patient shoulder CT scans was performed and glenoid version, AP diameter and height were measured. Statistical multiple regression models were used to investigate the ability of gender and ethnicity to predict glenoid AP diameter, height, and version independently of patient weight and height.
Results
The mean glenoid AP diameter was 24.7 ± 3.5, the mean glenoid height was 31.7 ± 3.7, and the mean glenoid version was 0.05 ± 9.05. According to our regression models, males would be expected to exhibit 8.4° more glenoid retroversion than females (
p
= 0.003) and have 2.9 mm larger glenoid height compared to females (
p
= 0.002). The predicted male glenoid AP diameter was 3.4 mm higher than that in females (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0341-2695 1432-5195 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00264-016-3201-8 |