A novel suture anchor constructed of cortical bone for rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study on sheep humerus specimens

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate biomechanical properties of a new type of suture anchors constructed of human cortical allograft bone and compare it with the similar standard titanium screw anchor for rotator cuff tears in sheep humerus model. Methods Twenty-four paired sheep humeri we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International orthopaedics 2016-09, Vol.40 (9), p.1913-1918
Hauptverfasser: Guo, Qi, Li, Chunbao, Qi, Wei, Li, Hongliang, Lu, Xi, Shen, Xuezhen, Qu, Feng, Liu, Yujie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate biomechanical properties of a new type of suture anchors constructed of human cortical allograft bone and compare it with the similar standard titanium screw anchor for rotator cuff tears in sheep humerus model. Methods Twenty-four paired sheep humeri were harvested from 12 male sheep aged 18 months. Specimens were divided into cortical bone anchor group and titanium screw anchor group. The anchors loaded with two sutures were placed at the footprint of infraspinatus tendon. Cyclic loading test was performed from 10 to 60 N at 1 Hz for 500 cycles and followed by a load-to-failure test at 33 mm/sec. A paired t-test was used to compare the biomechanical properties of the anchors of each type. Results No anchors failed during the cyclic phase, and the cortical bone anchors were all pulled out intact. The cyclic displacement of the cortical bone anchor was not significantly greater than that of the titanium screw anchor ( P  > 0.05). Student’s t test showed no statistically significant difference between anchors in terms of failure load (cortical bone anchor: 304.74 ± 64.46 N versus titanium screw anchor: 328.45 ± 89.58 N; P  = 0.213), ultimate load (cortical bone anchor: 325.82 ± 76.45 N versus titanium screw anchor: 345.61 ± 83.56 N; P  = 0.183), yield load (cortical bone anchor: 273.78 ± 44.75 N versus titanium screw anchor: 284.72 ± 56.37 N; P  = 0.326) or stiffness (cortical bone anchor: 52.97 ± 14.28 N/mm versus titanium screw anchor: 62.38 ± 18.35 N/mm; P  = 0.112). Conclusions In vitro , this experimental study suggested no statistically significant difference in initial fixation stability between the new type anchor and titanium screw anchor at a chosen level of significance ( P  
ISSN:0341-2695
1432-5195
DOI:10.1007/s00264-016-3185-4