Effects of an alveolar recruitment manoeuvre guided by lung ultrasound on anaesthesia‐induced atelectasis in infants: a randomised, controlled trial

Summary Atelectasis occurs in the majority of children undergoing general anaesthesia. Lung ultrasound has shown reliable sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing anaesthesia‐induced atelectasis. We assessed the effects of a recruitment manoeuvre on atelectasis using lung ultrasound in infants und...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anaesthesia 2017-02, Vol.72 (2), p.214-222
Hauptverfasser: Song, I.‐K., Kim, E.‐H., Lee, J.‐H., Ro, S., Kim, H.‐S., Kim, J.‐T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Atelectasis occurs in the majority of children undergoing general anaesthesia. Lung ultrasound has shown reliable sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing anaesthesia‐induced atelectasis. We assessed the effects of a recruitment manoeuvre on atelectasis using lung ultrasound in infants undergoing general anaesthesia. Forty infants, randomly allocated to either a recruitment manoeuvre group or a control group, received volume‐controlled ventilation with 5 cmH2O positive end‐expiratory pressure. Lung ultrasound examination was performed twice in each patient, the first a minute after starting mechanical ventilation of the lungs and the second at the end of surgery. Patients in the recruitment manoeuvre group received ultrasound‐guided recruitment manoeuvres after each lung ultrasound examination. The incidence of significant anaesthesia‐induced atelectasis at the second lung ultrasound examination was less in the recruitment manoeuvre group compared with the control group (25% vs. 80%; p = 0.001; odds ratio (OR) 0.083; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.019–0.370). The median (IQR [range]) lung ultrasound scores for consolidation and B‐lines on the second examination were lower in the recruitment manoeuvre group compared with the control group; 6.0 (3.0–9.3 [0.0–14.0]) vs. 13.5 (11.0–16.5 [8.0–23.0]); p < 0.001 and 6.5 (3.0–12.0 [0.0–28.0]) vs. 15.0 (10.8–20.5 [7.0–28.0]); p < 0.001, respectively. The lung ultrasound scores for consolidation on the first and second examinations showed a negative correlation with age (r = −0.340, p = 0.008; r = −0.380, p = 0.003). We conclude that ultrasound‐guided recruitment manoeuvres with positive end‐expiratory pressure proved useful in reducing the incidence of anaesthesia‐induced atelectasis in infants, although 5 cmH2O positive end‐expiratory pressure alone was not sufficient to eliminate it. In addition, the younger the patient, the more susceptible they were to atelectasis.
ISSN:0003-2409
1365-2044
DOI:10.1111/anae.13713