Background matters: Minor vibratory stimulation during motor skill acquisition selectively reduces off-line memory consolidation

•Neuron-level processes sub-serving long-term motor memory formation are triggered by practice.•Whether these processes will proceed to a successful completion is under strict control (gating).•Vibratory stimulation during motor sequence training did not affect the acquisition phase gains.•Off-line,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurobiology of learning and memory 2017-04, Vol.140, p.27-32
Hauptverfasser: Korman, Maria, Herling, Zohar, Levy, Ishay, Egbarieh, Nebal, Engel-Yeger, Batya, Karni, Avi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Neuron-level processes sub-serving long-term motor memory formation are triggered by practice.•Whether these processes will proceed to a successful completion is under strict control (gating).•Vibratory stimulation during motor sequence training did not affect the acquisition phase gains.•Off-line, consolidation phase, gains were selectively reduced by stimulation during training.•A motor training resulting in robust online gains does not necessarily ensure skill consolidation.•Extra-task vibratory stimulation during acquisition phase may modulate long-term plasticity.•Exposure to vibration is a counterpart of pharmacologically induced gating of consolidation. Although a ubiquitous situation, it is not clear how effective is a learning experience when task-irrelevant, sensory noise occurs in the background. Here, young adults were trained on the finger opposition sequence task, in a well-established training and testing protocol affording measures for online as well as off-line learning. During the training session, one group experienced a minor background vibratory stimulation to the trunk by the means of vibrating cushion, while the second group experienced recorded sound vibrations. A control group was trained with no extra sensory stimulation. Sensory stimulation during training had no effect on the online within-session gains, but dampened the expression of the off-line, consolidation phase, gains in the two sensory stimulation groups. These results suggest that background sensory stimulation can selectively modify off-line, procedural memory consolidation processes, despite well-preserved on-line learning. Classical studies have shown that neural plasticity in sensory systems is modulated by motor input. The current results extend this notion and suggest that some types of task-irrelevant sensory stimulation, concurrent with motor training, may constitute a ‘gating’ factor - modulating the triggering of long-term procedural memory consolidation processes. Thus, vibratory stimulation may be considered as a behavioral counterpart of pharmacological interventions that do not interfere with short term neural plasticity but block long-term plasticity.
ISSN:1074-7427
1095-9564
DOI:10.1016/j.nlm.2017.02.002