Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Comment on Schwartz et al. (2016)
This article calls attention to a large body of uncited literature that renders the levels of analysis argument upon which Schwartz, Lilienfeld, Meca, and Sauvigné (2016) based their reappraisal of the role of neuroscience within psychology obsolete. Examples of effective integration of psychology a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The American psychologist 2016-12, Vol.71 (9), p.896-897 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 897 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 896 |
| container_title | The American psychologist |
| container_volume | 71 |
| creator | Tryon, Warren W |
| description | This article calls attention to a large body of uncited literature that renders the levels of analysis argument upon which Schwartz, Lilienfeld, Meca, and Sauvigné (2016) based their reappraisal of the role of neuroscience within psychology obsolete. Examples of effective integration of psychology and neuroscience without benefit of any bridging laws are provided. Implications for training are mentioned. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/amp0000031 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1866650274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1866650274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-f63db76b04dfe114c3bc885329d928fbe08636e88aecef0357876b17bedd1d743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1rFTEUBuAgir2tbvwBEnBTlannTGby4U4uVStFBRW6C5nMmdsp89VkBrn-ejPcquBGswk5PLyQ8zL2BOEMQahXrp9gPQLvsQ0aUWbGwNV9tllnGUh5dcSOY7xJz1IbfMiOcg0iV7rYsA8Xw0y74OZ22PHPce-vx27c7bkbav6RljBG39Lg6TXfjn1Pw8zHgX_x199dmH9wmrnrzvhpDiifP2IPGtdFenx3n7Bvb8-_bt9nl5_eXWzfXGauwHzOGinqSskKirohxMKLymtditzUJtdNRaClkKS1I08NiFLppFFVVNdYq0KcsNND7hTG24XibPs2euo6N9C4RItaSllC_l-0LBBkIfNEn_1Fb8YlDOkjq1KiBATzDyVUiQAyqRcH5dP-YqDGTqHtXdhbBLtWZv9UlvDTu8il6qn-TX91lMDLA3CTs1OqKK2-9R1Fv4SQGlnDrEJrrDZS_ARx7p0U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1853751006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Comment on Schwartz et al. (2016)</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Tryon, Warren W</creator><contributor>Kazak, Anne E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tryon, Warren W ; Kazak, Anne E</creatorcontrib><description>This article calls attention to a large body of uncited literature that renders the levels of analysis argument upon which Schwartz, Lilienfeld, Meca, and Sauvigné (2016) based their reappraisal of the role of neuroscience within psychology obsolete. Examples of effective integration of psychology and neuroscience without benefit of any bridging laws are provided. Implications for training are mentioned.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-066X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-990X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/amp0000031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28032784</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMPSAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Dissent and Disputes ; Funding ; Government Agencies ; Human ; Humans ; Neural Networks ; Neuroscience ; Neurosciences ; Personnel Selection ; Psychology ; Students ; Training</subject><ispartof>The American psychologist, 2016-12, Vol.71 (9), p.896-897</ispartof><rights>2016 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2016, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Dec 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-f63db76b04dfe114c3bc885329d928fbe08636e88aecef0357876b17bedd1d743</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28032784$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kazak, Anne E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tryon, Warren W</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Comment on Schwartz et al. (2016)</title><title>The American psychologist</title><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><description>This article calls attention to a large body of uncited literature that renders the levels of analysis argument upon which Schwartz, Lilienfeld, Meca, and Sauvigné (2016) based their reappraisal of the role of neuroscience within psychology obsolete. Examples of effective integration of psychology and neuroscience without benefit of any bridging laws are provided. Implications for training are mentioned.</description><subject>Dissent and Disputes</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Government Agencies</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neural Networks</subject><subject>Neuroscience</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Personnel Selection</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0003-066X</issn><issn>1935-990X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1rFTEUBuAgir2tbvwBEnBTlannTGby4U4uVStFBRW6C5nMmdsp89VkBrn-ejPcquBGswk5PLyQ8zL2BOEMQahXrp9gPQLvsQ0aUWbGwNV9tllnGUh5dcSOY7xJz1IbfMiOcg0iV7rYsA8Xw0y74OZ22PHPce-vx27c7bkbav6RljBG39Lg6TXfjn1Pw8zHgX_x199dmH9wmrnrzvhpDiifP2IPGtdFenx3n7Bvb8-_bt9nl5_eXWzfXGauwHzOGinqSskKirohxMKLymtditzUJtdNRaClkKS1I08NiFLppFFVVNdYq0KcsNND7hTG24XibPs2euo6N9C4RItaSllC_l-0LBBkIfNEn_1Fb8YlDOkjq1KiBATzDyVUiQAyqRcH5dP-YqDGTqHtXdhbBLtWZv9UlvDTu8il6qn-TX91lMDLA3CTs1OqKK2-9R1Fv4SQGlnDrEJrrDZS_ARx7p0U</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Tryon, Warren W</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Comment on Schwartz et al. (2016)</title><author>Tryon, Warren W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-f63db76b04dfe114c3bc885329d928fbe08636e88aecef0357876b17bedd1d743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Dissent and Disputes</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Government Agencies</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neural Networks</topic><topic>Neuroscience</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Personnel Selection</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tryon, Warren W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tryon, Warren W</au><au>Kazak, Anne E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Comment on Schwartz et al. (2016)</atitle><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>896</spage><epage>897</epage><pages>896-897</pages><issn>0003-066X</issn><eissn>1935-990X</eissn><coden>AMPSAB</coden><abstract>This article calls attention to a large body of uncited literature that renders the levels of analysis argument upon which Schwartz, Lilienfeld, Meca, and Sauvigné (2016) based their reappraisal of the role of neuroscience within psychology obsolete. Examples of effective integration of psychology and neuroscience without benefit of any bridging laws are provided. Implications for training are mentioned.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>28032784</pmid><doi>10.1037/amp0000031</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-066X |
| ispartof | The American psychologist, 2016-12, Vol.71 (9), p.896-897 |
| issn | 0003-066X 1935-990X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1866650274 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Dissent and Disputes Funding Government Agencies Human Humans Neural Networks Neuroscience Neurosciences Personnel Selection Psychology Students Training |
| title | Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Comment on Schwartz et al. (2016) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A46%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20Psychology%20and%20Neuroscience:%20Comment%20on%20Schwartz%20et%20al.%20(2016)&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20psychologist&rft.au=Tryon,%20Warren%20W&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=896&rft.epage=897&rft.pages=896-897&rft.issn=0003-066X&rft.eissn=1935-990X&rft.coden=AMPSAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/amp0000031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1866650274%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1853751006&rft_id=info:pmid/28032784&rfr_iscdi=true |