Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Comment on Schwartz et al. (2016)
This article calls attention to a large body of uncited literature that renders the levels of analysis argument upon which Schwartz, Lilienfeld, Meca, and Sauvigné (2016) based their reappraisal of the role of neuroscience within psychology obsolete. Examples of effective integration of psychology a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American psychologist 2016-12, Vol.71 (9), p.896-897 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This article calls attention to a large body of uncited literature that renders the levels of analysis argument upon which Schwartz, Lilienfeld, Meca, and Sauvigné (2016) based their reappraisal of the role of neuroscience within psychology obsolete. Examples of effective integration of psychology and neuroscience without benefit of any bridging laws are provided. Implications for training are mentioned. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-066X 1935-990X |
DOI: | 10.1037/amp0000031 |