Isolated tracheoesophageal fistula versus esophageal atresia – early morbidity and short-term outcome. A single institution series

Abstract Purpose We compared the postnatal course, morbidity and early results after repair for cases of isolated or "pure" TEF with those for cases of esophageal atresia (EA) with distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). Methods Twenty-four consecutive infants were divided into two groups:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 2017-03, Vol.94, p.104-111
Hauptverfasser: Tröbs, R.B, Finke, W, Bahr, M, Roll, C, Nissen, M, Vahdad, M.R, Cernaianu, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Purpose We compared the postnatal course, morbidity and early results after repair for cases of isolated or "pure" TEF with those for cases of esophageal atresia (EA) with distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). Methods Twenty-four consecutive infants were divided into two groups: isolated TEF [TEF group] (n=5) and EA with distal TEF [EA group] (n=19). Results. A high rate of prematurity (29%) and major cardiac and other surgically-relevant malformations (0.8 vs. 0.7 per infant) was found in both groups. The median age at surgery was 8 days for the TEF group vs. 1 day for the EA group (p
ISSN:0165-5876
1872-8464
DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.01.022