Assessing adhesive remnant removal and enamel damage with ultraviolet light: An in-vitro study

Introduction Our objective was to assess the amounts of adhesive remnant and enamel damage when removing composite under conventional lighting and ultraviolet (UV) light. Methods Thirty-eight premolars were divided into 2 groups according to the lighting used for adhesive removal. A multifluted tung...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2017-02, Vol.151 (2), p.292-296
Hauptverfasser: Ribeiro, Alexandre Antonio, Almeida, Layene Figueiredo, Martins, Lidia Parsekian, Martins, Renato Parsekian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Our objective was to assess the amounts of adhesive remnant and enamel damage when removing composite under conventional lighting and ultraviolet (UV) light. Methods Thirty-eight premolars were divided into 2 groups according to the lighting used for adhesive removal. A multifluted tungsten-carbide bur at low speed was used for this process in both groups. The UV group received conventional lighting associated with UV light, and the conventional group received conventional lighting only. The amounts of adhesive remnant were calculated using images of the teeth taken under UV light with software. Scanning electron microscopy images of epoxy adhesive replicas of the teeth made before bonding and after adhesive removal were graded according to the enamel damage index (EDI), and the difference between the final and initial EDI scores was used for assessment of the enamel damage. To detect differences between the groups, the Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze the data from the adhesive remnant index and the EDI. Results The conventional group had more adhesive left on the enamel ( P  
ISSN:0889-5406
1097-6752
DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.040