Diagnostic accuracy of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein for sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department

Background Biomarkers can facilitate the diagnosis of sepsis, enabling early management and improving outcomes. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) has been reported as a biomarker for the detection of infection, but its diagnostic value is controversial. In this study, we assessed the diagnost...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of clinical biochemistry 2018-01, Vol.55 (1), p.143-148
Hauptverfasser: García de Guadiana Romualdo, Luis, Albaladejo Otón, María Dolores, Rebollo Acebes, Sergio, Esteban Torrella, Patricia, Hernando Holgado, Ana, Jiménez Santos, Enrique, Jiménez Sánchez, Roberto, Ortón Freire, Alejandro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Biomarkers can facilitate the diagnosis of sepsis, enabling early management and improving outcomes. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) has been reported as a biomarker for the detection of infection, but its diagnostic value is controversial. In this study, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of LBP for sepsis in the emergency department (ED) patients, comparing it with more established biomarkers of sepsis, including procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Methods LBP and other sepsis biomarkers, including PCT and CRP, were measured on admission in 102 adult patients presenting with suspected infection. Classification of patients was performed using the recently updated definition for sepsis (Sepsis-3). The diagnostic accuracy of LBP, CRP and PCT for sepsis was evaluated by using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Results A total of 49 patients were classified as having sepsis. In these patients, median (interquartile range) LBP (41.8 [41.1] µg/dL vs. 26.2 [25] µg/dL), CRP (240 [205] mg/L vs. 160 [148] mg/dL) and PCT (5.19 [13.68] µg/L vs. 0.39 [1.09] µg/L) were significantly higher than in patients classified as not having sepsis (P 
ISSN:0004-5632
1758-1001
DOI:10.1177/0004563217694378