Arsenic-Related Chromosomal Alterations in Bladder Cancer
Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that ingestion of arsenic in drinking water is a strong risk factor for several forms of cancer, including bladder cancer. It is not known whether arsenic-related cancers are genetically similar to cancers in unexposed individuals or what mechanisms of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2002-11, Vol.94 (22), p.1688-1696 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that ingestion of arsenic in drinking water is a strong risk factor for several forms of cancer, including bladder cancer. It is not known whether arsenic-related cancers are genetically similar to cancers in unexposed individuals or what mechanisms of carcinogenesis may underlie their formation. This study was designed to compare chromosomal alterations in bladder cancers of arsenic-exposed individuals to provide insight into the mechanism of how arsenic may induce or promote cancer. Methods: A case–case study was conducted in Argentina and Chile examining chromosomal alterations in bladder tumor DNA in 123 patients who had been exposed to arsenic in their drinking water. Patients were placed into one of four arsenic exposure categories according to their average 5-year peak arsenic exposure. Patients were also classified as ever smokers or never smokers. Comparative genomic hybridization was used to identify chromosomal alterations throughout the genome. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The total number of chromosomal alterations was higher in individuals exposed to higher arsenic levels (5.7 ± 5.1, 5.6 ± 5.1, 7.3 ± 7.4, and 9.1 ± 6.5 [mean ± standard deviation] chromosomal alterations per tumor with increasing arsenic exposure; Ptrend = .02, adjusted for stage and grade). The trend was stronger in high-grade (G2–G3) tumors (6.3 ± 5.5, 8.3 ± 4.7, 10.3 ± 7.8, and 10.5 ± 6.4 alterations per tumor; Ptrend = .01) than it was in low-grade (G1) tumors (3.5 ± 3.1, 1.1 ± 1.1, 2.5 ± 2.5, and 3.6 ± 3.2 alterations per tumor; Ptrend = .79). The mean number of chromosomal alterations also increased with tumor stage and grade (Ptrend |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0027-8874 1460-2105 1460-2105 |
DOI: | 10.1093/jnci/94.22.1688 |