Theoretical aspects and interpretation of thermal measurements concerning the subsurface investigation of a cometary nucleus

Part of the lander payload for the comet rendezvous mission Rosetta is the thermal probe multi-purpose sensors for surface and subsurface science (MUPUS). In this paper, we discuss the relationship of the expected MUPUS data to structural and textural parameters of the near-surface layers of the com...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Planetary and space science 2002-08, Vol.50 (9), p.929-937
Hauptverfasser: Keller, Thomas, Spohn, Tilman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Part of the lander payload for the comet rendezvous mission Rosetta is the thermal probe multi-purpose sensors for surface and subsurface science (MUPUS). In this paper, we discuss the relationship of the expected MUPUS data to structural and textural parameters of the near-surface layers of the cometary nucleus. Such properties could be crucial parameters concerning the formation and evolution of the nucleus. Thus, we calculate the thermal conductivity of a porous material in terms of microstructural parameters, using a geometrical model with a solid matrix, a surrounding pore space and a distinct contact area between different particles. We include the possibility that a significant amount of heat may be transported by pore filling vapour in addition to heat conducted via the matrix. Furthermore, we consider that the heat is transmitted through only a fraction of the grains and these are organized into a chain-like structure. These chains—and not the single grains—should be regarded as the basic unit of structure. Applying our model to measured thermal conductivities of porous water ice, we interpret the material in terms of microparameters and estimate the effective size of the contact area and the effective pore radius. The results are in good agreement with our knowledge of the prepared samples. Contrary, we can also show that popular models used in cometary research do not fit with laboratory data at all.
ISSN:0032-0633
1873-5088
DOI:10.1016/S0032-0633(02)00068-5