Disruption of gel phase lipid packing efficiency by sucralose studied with merocyanine 540
[Display omitted] •The impact of sucralose on lipid packing is investigated using merocyanine 540.•A comparison of sucralose to sucrose indicates different interaction mechanisms.•Sucralose decreases packing efficiency of model membranes.•It is proposed that sucralose disrupts water organization at...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Colloids and surfaces, B, Biointerfaces B, Biointerfaces, 2017-04, Vol.152, p.214-219 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | [Display omitted]
•The impact of sucralose on lipid packing is investigated using merocyanine 540.•A comparison of sucralose to sucrose indicates different interaction mechanisms.•Sucralose decreases packing efficiency of model membranes.•It is proposed that sucralose disrupts water organization at lipid membrane surfaces.
Sucralose, an artificial sweetener, displays very different behavior towards membranes than its synthetic precursor sucrose. The impact of both sugars on model dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine model membranes was investigated using absorbance and flourescence spectroscopy and the membrane probe merocyanine 540. This probe molecule is highly sensitive to changes in membrane packing, microviscosity and polarity. This work focuses on the impact of sugars on the outer leaflet of unilamellar dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine model membranes. The choice of lipid permits access to the gel phase at room temperature and incorporation of the dye after liposome formation allows us to examine the direct impact of the sugar on the outer leaflet while maximizing the response of the dye to changes in the bilayer. The results demonstrate that sucrose has no impact on the packing efficiency of lipids in unilamellar DPPC vesicles in the gel phase. Conversely sucralose decreases the packing efficiency of lipids in the gel phase and results in decreased microviscosity and increased membrane fluidity, which may be as a result of water disruption at the membrane water interface. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0927-7765 1873-4367 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.01.026 |