Randomized clinical trial of duct‐to‐mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy versus handsewn closure after distal pancreatectomy

Background Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a major cause of morbidity after distal pancreatectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether duct‐to‐mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy of the pancreatic stump decreased clinical POPF formation compared with handsewn closure after dis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of surgery 2017-04, Vol.104 (5), p.536-543
Hauptverfasser: Uemura, K., Satoi, S., Motoi, F., Kwon, M., Unno, M., Murakami, Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a major cause of morbidity after distal pancreatectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether duct‐to‐mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy of the pancreatic stump decreased clinical POPF formation compared with handsewn closure after distal pancreatectomy. Methods This multicentre RCT was performed between April 2012 and June 2014. Patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy were assigned randomly to either duct‐to‐mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy or handsewn closure. The primary endpoint was the incidence of clinical POPF. Secondary endpoints were rates of other complications and length of hospital stay. Results Some 80 patients were randomized, and 73 patients were evaluated in an intention‐to‐treat analysis: 36 in the pancreaticogastrostomy group and 37 in the handsewn closure group. The duration of operation was significantly longer in the pancreaticogastrostomy group than in the handsewn closure group (mean 268 versus 197 min respectively; P 
ISSN:0007-1323
1365-2168
DOI:10.1002/bjs.10458