Tattoo removal by Q‐switched yttrium aluminium garnet laser: client satisfaction
Background Tattoo removal by Q‐switched yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG) lasers is golden standard; however, clients’ satisfaction with treatment is little known. Objective To determine clients’ satisfaction with tattoo removal. Methods One hundred and fifty‐four tattoo removal clients who had attende...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2017-05, Vol.31 (5), p.904-909 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Tattoo removal by Q‐switched yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG) lasers is golden standard; however, clients’ satisfaction with treatment is little known.
Objective
To determine clients’ satisfaction with tattoo removal.
Methods
One hundred and fifty‐four tattoo removal clients who had attended the private clinic ‘Centre for Laser Surgery’, Hellerup, Denmark, from 2001 to 2013 completed a questionnaire concerning outcome expectations, level of pain experiences and satisfaction with tattoo removal. The laser surgeon and his team were blinded from data handling. The study design included a minimum 2‐year postlaser treatment observation period from 2013 to 2015.
Results
Overall, clients were satisfied with their laser treatment; 85% assessed their treatment and results to be acceptable to superb, while 15% assessed their treatment and results to be inferior to unacceptable. Effectiveness relative to colour of tattoo on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (complete removal) scored a mean of blue 9.5, black 9.4, yellow 8.9, red 8.8 and green 6.5. Clients were dissatisfied with green pigment remnants, which could mimic bruising. One hundred and twenty‐nine clients (84%) experienced moderate to extreme pain during treatment. Twenty‐eight (20%) developed minor scarring. There were many reasons for tattoo removal; e.g. stigmatisation (33%), conspicuousness (29%) and poor artistic quality (22%). One hundred and two clients had expected complete removal of tattoos without a blemish, expectations that were only partly fulfilled. During the treatment period, clients adjusted expectations and adapted more realistic views of outcomes.
Conclusion
The majority of clients were satisfied with Q‐switched YAG laser removal of tattoos despite high pretreatment expectations which were only partly met. The study supports YAG lasers for tattoo removal as acceptable therapy of today, with room for new approaches. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0926-9959 1468-3083 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jdv.14124 |