Assessment of intracranial meningioma‐associated calcifications using susceptibility‐weighted MRI

Purpose To determine the diagnostic accuracy of susceptibility‐weighted MRI (SW‐MRI) for the detection of intracranial meningioma‐associated calcifications compared with standard MR sequences, using computed tomography (CT) as a reference standard. Materials and Methods 354 patients, who had receive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2017-10, Vol.46 (4), p.1177-1186
Hauptverfasser: Adams, Lisa C., Böker, Sarah M., Bender, Yvonne Y., Fallenberg, Eva M., Wagner, Moritz, Buchert, Ralph, Hamm, Bernd, Makowski, Marcus R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To determine the diagnostic accuracy of susceptibility‐weighted MRI (SW‐MRI) for the detection of intracranial meningioma‐associated calcifications compared with standard MR sequences, using computed tomography (CT) as a reference standard. Materials and Methods 354 patients, who had received both a CT and a 1.5 Tesla clinical brain MRI with SW‐MRI sequences between January 2014 and July 2016, were retrospectively evaluated and 316 patients were included. Calcification diameter was used to assess correlation between imaging modalities. Sensitivity and specificity as well as intra‐ and interobserver agreement were calculated for SW‐MRI and standard MRI sequences when compared with reference standard CT. Results Fifty patients had positive findings for intracranial meningioma‐associated calcifications on CT scans. SW‐MRI reached a sensitivity of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83–99%) and a specificity of 95% (95% CI: 92–98%) for the detection of meningioma‐associated calcifications, while standard MRI yielded a sensitivity of 64% (95% CI: 49–77%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI: 90–96%). Diameter measurements between SW‐MRI and CT showed a close correlation (R2 = 0.99; P 
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.25614