THE IMPACT OF BETAPLUS PROGRAM ON PATIENT TREATMENT SATISFACTION WITH INTERFERON BETA-1B IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: MULTICENTRIC CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY IN THE WESTERN BALKAN COUNTRIES

Abstract Background Long-term treatment adherence to disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) may have significant impact on clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS). It has been recently emphasized that low treatment satisfaction (TS) may be an important factor for achieving high rates of treatment adherence. Interferon (IFN) beta-1b was the first DMD approved for the treatment of MS. The aims of our study were to assess TS in subjects with relapsing-remitting (RR) MS treated with IFN beta-1b in Serbia, Montenegro and the Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H), and additionally, to evaluate the impact of patient support program on TS and adherence. Methods This is a cross-sectional survey performed in order to examine TS and adherence with IFN beta-1b in seven MS centers across three countries (Serbia, Montenegro and B&H). Included in the study were 296 adult patients with RRMS treated with IFN beta-1b for at least 6 months. They were invited to complete the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM). Additional two treatment adherence questions were also asked. Patient support program (Betaplus®) was available exclusively for patients in Serbia and not for those in Montenegro and the Republika Srpska, B&H. In order to assess the potential impact of this program on TSQM, we combined two groups of patients from Montenegro and B&H and compared their results with those from patients in Serbia. Statistical analysis includes multivariable linear regression analysis in order to assess the differences between three MS patients groups in terms of the TSQM scores, adjusted for potential confounders. For the evaluation of the effects of Betaplus® program, multivariable logistic regression was used, controlling for the same confounding factors. Results Each of the TSQM summary scores in all three countries implicated high level of patients’ satisfaction. There was statistically significant group difference on the Effectiveness summary score (p=0.001) and the Side effects summary score (p=0.006) between the group of subjects from Serbia and the combined group of subjects from Montenegro and B&H, in favor of the former cohort. There was statistically significant group difference neither on the Convenience summary score nor on the Overall satisfaction summary score. Results of adjusted logistic regression analysis based on the availability of patient support program (dependent variable) implicate that it had the most significant impact on the Effectiv