Characteristics of Anatomy and Function of the Left Atrial Appendage and Their Relationships in Patients with Cardioembolic Stroke: A 3-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography Study

Background Increasing attention is being paid to the left atrial appendage (LAA) in the context of risk stratification in cardioembolic stroke (CES) and the requirement for meticulous planning of percutaneous closure device implantation. However, detailed systematic assessment of the LAA remains lim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases 2017-03, Vol.26 (3), p.470-479
Hauptverfasser: Matsumoto, Yuki, MD, Morino, Yoshihiro, MD, Kumagai, Akiko, MD, Hozawa, Maiko, MD, Nakamura, Motoyuki, MD, Terayama, Yasuo, MD, Tashiro, Atsushi, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Increasing attention is being paid to the left atrial appendage (LAA) in the context of risk stratification in cardioembolic stroke (CES) and the requirement for meticulous planning of percutaneous closure device implantation. However, detailed systematic assessment of the LAA remains limited. Methods This study evaluated the anatomy and function of LAA using 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) on 194 consecutive patients older than 50 years old hospitalized exclusively for CES. Patients were stratified into 3 groups on the basis of cardiac rhythm: (1) chronic atrial fibrillation (AF), n = 53; (2) paroxysmal AF, n = 26; and (3) no detected AF, n = 115. Results Significant differences between the groups were observed for anatomical (orifice area [OA], depth, diastolic volume) and functional parameters (ejection fraction [EF], flow velocity [FV]), as measured by 3D-TEE. The anatomical parameters were consistently the greatest, and functional parameters were the poorest, in the group with chronic AF. There were significant inverse correlations between them (r = −.33, P  = .0003 for depth and EF; r = −.27, P  = .0020 for depth and FV; r = −.22, P  = .016 for OA and EF; and r = −.38, P  
ISSN:1052-3057
1532-8511
DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.12.014