Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement is Associated with Comparable Clinical Outcomes to Open Aortic Valve Surgery but with a Reduced Length of In-Patient Hospital Stay: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials

Background Aortic valve replacement is indicated in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has evolved as a potential strategy in a growing proportion of patients in preference to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This meta-analysis aims to assess the differential outcomes of TAVR and SAVR in patients enrolled in published randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Methods A systematic literature search of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, OVID, and PubMed MEDLINE was performed. Randomised controlled trials of patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR compared with SAVR were included. Clinical outcomes and procedural complications were assessed. Results Five RCTs with a total of 3,828 patients (1,928 TAVR and 1,900 SAVR) were analysed. There was no statistically significant difference in combined rates of all-cause mortality and stroke at 30-days for TAVR vs SAVR (6.3% vs 7.5%; OR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.64-1.08; P = 0.17) or at 12 months (17.2% vs 19.2%; OR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.73-1.03; P = 0.29). No statistically significant difference was seen for death or stroke separately at any time point although a numerical trend in favour of TAVR for both was recorded. Length of in-patient stay was significantly less with TAVR vs SAVR (9.6 +/- 7.7 days vs 12.2 +/- 8.8 days; OR -2.94; 95% CI: -4.64 to -1.24; P = 0.0007). Major vascular complications were more frequent in patients undergoing TAVR vs SAVR (8.2% vs. 4.0%; OR 2.15; 95% CI: 1.62-2.86; P