Recent Results of In Situ Abdominal Aortic Reconstruction with Cryopreserved Arterial Allograft

Objective To evaluate treatment outcomes of in situ abdominal aortic reconstruction with cryopreserved arterial allograft (CAA) for patients with abdominal aortic infection. Materials and methods A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted of patients who underwent in situ a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 2017-02, Vol.53 (2), p.158-167
Hauptverfasser: Heo, S.-H, Kim, Y.-W, Woo, S.-Y, Park, Y.-J, Kim, D.-K, Chung, D.-R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To evaluate treatment outcomes of in situ abdominal aortic reconstruction with cryopreserved arterial allograft (CAA) for patients with abdominal aortic infection. Materials and methods A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted of patients who underwent in situ aortic reconstruction using CAA for primary, secondary, or prosthetic infection of the abdominal aorta between May 2006 and July 2015, at a single institution. Clinical presentation, indications for treatment, procedural details, early post-operative mortality and morbidity, late death, and graft related complications during the follow up period were investigated. Patient survival and event free survival (any death or re-operation) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Twenty-five patients (male, n  = 20, 80%; mean age, 70.2 ± 8.7 years) underwent in situ abdominal aortic reconstruction (48% aortic, 52% aorto-bi-iliac) with vessel size and ABO matched CAA for treatment of abdominal aortic infection caused by infected abdominal aortic aneurysm ( n  = 15), aortic prosthesis infection ( n  = 7), aortic reconstruction with concomitant colon resection ( n  = 2), and primary suppurative aortitis ( n  = 1). The median follow up was 19.1 months (range 1–73 months). There were seven post-operative deaths including two (8%) early (
ISSN:1078-5884
1532-2165
DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.07.090