Enhanced Recovery after Bariatric Surgery in the Severely Obese, Morbidly Obese, Super-Morbidly Obese and Super-Super Morbidly Obese Using Evidence-Based Clinical Pathways: a Comparative Study
Background We discuss the anesthetic outcome in morbidly obese patients under the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Our evidence-based clinical pathways focused on prehabilitation and included interventions like aggressive preoperative optimization of medical comorbidities, familiariz...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obesity surgery 2017-03, Vol.27 (3), p.560-568 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
We discuss the anesthetic outcome in morbidly obese patients under the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Our evidence-based clinical pathways focused on prehabilitation and included interventions like aggressive preoperative optimization of medical comorbidities, familiarizing with perioperative protocols, thromboprophylaxis, opioid free multimodal analgesia, and early ambulation.
Methods
We did a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 823 patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Our goal was to assess the effects of BMI on the recovery and anesthetic outcome parameters, under the categories of severely obese (SeO: BMI 60 kg/m
2
). Time to ambulate (TA) was the primary variable.
Results
Requirement for non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was the only significant predictor of TA and discharge readiness (DR); the DR was further affected by functional capacity and presence of chest pain. Our analysis indicated that each unit increase in BMI (kg/m
2
) contributes to increase in ambulation time by 1.24 min (95 % CI: 0.648 to 1.832 min;
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-8923 1708-0428 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11695-016-2366-y |