Intravenous injection of gadobutrol in an epidemiological study group did not lead to a difference in relative signal intensities of certain brain structures after 5 years

Purpose To investigate if application of macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents in volunteers is associated with neuronal deposition detected by magnetic resonance imaging in a 5-year longitudinal survey. Materials and methods Three hundred eighty-seven volunteers who participated in a populat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2017-02, Vol.27 (2), p.772-777
Hauptverfasser: Kromrey, Marie-Luise, Liedtke, Kim Rouven, Ittermann, Till, Langner, Sönke, Kirsch, Michael, Weitschies, Werner, Kühn, Jens-Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 777
container_issue 2
container_start_page 772
container_title European radiology
container_volume 27
creator Kromrey, Marie-Luise
Liedtke, Kim Rouven
Ittermann, Till
Langner, Sönke
Kirsch, Michael
Weitschies, Werner
Kühn, Jens-Peter
description Purpose To investigate if application of macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents in volunteers is associated with neuronal deposition detected by magnetic resonance imaging in a 5-year longitudinal survey. Materials and methods Three hundred eighty-seven volunteers who participated in a population-based study were enrolled. Subjects underwent plain T1-weighted brain MRI at baseline and 5 years later with identical sequence parameters. At baseline, 271 participants additionally received intravenous injection of the macrocyclic contrast agent gadobutrol (1.5 mmol/kg). A control group including 116 subjects received no contrast agent. Relative signal intensities of thalamus, pallidum, pons and dentate nucleus were compared at baseline and follow-up. Results No difference in relative signal intensities was observed between contrast group (thalamus, p = 0.865; pallidum, p = 0.263; pons, p = 0.533; dentate nucleus, p = 0.396) and control group (thalamus, p = 0.683; pallidum; p = 0.970; pons, p = 0.773; dentate nucleus, p = 0.232) at both times. Comparison between both groups revealed no significant differences in relative signal intensities (thalamus, p = 0.413; pallidum, p = 0.653; pons, p = 0.460; dentate nucleus, p = 0.751). The study showed no significant change in globus pallidus-to-thalamus or dentate nucleus-to-pons ratios. Conclusions Five years after administration of a 1.5-fold dose gadobutrol to normal subjects, signal intensity of thalamus, pallidum, pons and dentate nucleus did not differ from participants who had not received gadobutrol. Key Points • Gadobutrol does not lead to neuronal signal alterations after 5 years . • Neuronal deposition of macrocyclic contrast agent could not be confirmed . • Macrocyclic contrast agents in a proven dosage are safe .
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00330-016-4418-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859500383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826696371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-28516a7f809ee707d8ad8559bf2e2d7df40a968770d58578671590474dafec0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcGKFDEURQtRnHb0A9xIwM1sSl9SSSVZyqDjwIAbXRepykuTpjppk9RAz9fMB_gVfpkpexQRBDcJvHfufXBv07yk8IYCyLcZoOugBdq3nFPV3j1qNpR3rKWg-ONmA7pTrdSanzXPct4BgKZcPm3OmGSMip5umm_XoSRziyEumfiww6n4GEh0ZGtsHJeS4lznxASCB29x7-Mct34yM8llsUeyTXE5EOstCbGQGY0lJRJTJ85hwjDhKk84m-JvkWS_DWZ1LBiyLx7zemvCVEzFxrS-uaRlKkuqO-MKJiK-3x_RpPy8eeLMnPHFw3_efPnw_vPlx_bm09X15bubduIgSsuUoL2RToFGlCCtMlYJoUfHkFlpHQejeyUlWKGEVL2kQgOX3BqHE4zdeXNx8j2k-HXBXIa9zxPOswlYcxqoElrU7FX3Hyjre913klb09V_oLi6ppvHTkGslmNKVoidqSjHnhG44JL836ThQGNbWh1PrQ219WFsf7qrm1YPzMu7R_lb8qrkC7ATkugpbTH-c_qfrDzCtu2k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1854985289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intravenous injection of gadobutrol in an epidemiological study group did not lead to a difference in relative signal intensities of certain brain structures after 5 years</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Kromrey, Marie-Luise ; Liedtke, Kim Rouven ; Ittermann, Till ; Langner, Sönke ; Kirsch, Michael ; Weitschies, Werner ; Kühn, Jens-Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Kromrey, Marie-Luise ; Liedtke, Kim Rouven ; Ittermann, Till ; Langner, Sönke ; Kirsch, Michael ; Weitschies, Werner ; Kühn, Jens-Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To investigate if application of macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents in volunteers is associated with neuronal deposition detected by magnetic resonance imaging in a 5-year longitudinal survey. Materials and methods Three hundred eighty-seven volunteers who participated in a population-based study were enrolled. Subjects underwent plain T1-weighted brain MRI at baseline and 5 years later with identical sequence parameters. At baseline, 271 participants additionally received intravenous injection of the macrocyclic contrast agent gadobutrol (1.5 mmol/kg). A control group including 116 subjects received no contrast agent. Relative signal intensities of thalamus, pallidum, pons and dentate nucleus were compared at baseline and follow-up. Results No difference in relative signal intensities was observed between contrast group (thalamus, p = 0.865; pallidum, p = 0.263; pons, p = 0.533; dentate nucleus, p = 0.396) and control group (thalamus, p = 0.683; pallidum; p = 0.970; pons, p = 0.773; dentate nucleus, p = 0.232) at both times. Comparison between both groups revealed no significant differences in relative signal intensities (thalamus, p = 0.413; pallidum, p = 0.653; pons, p = 0.460; dentate nucleus, p = 0.751). The study showed no significant change in globus pallidus-to-thalamus or dentate nucleus-to-pons ratios. Conclusions Five years after administration of a 1.5-fold dose gadobutrol to normal subjects, signal intensity of thalamus, pallidum, pons and dentate nucleus did not differ from participants who had not received gadobutrol. Key Points • Gadobutrol does not lead to neuronal signal alterations after 5 years . • Neuronal deposition of macrocyclic contrast agent could not be confirmed . • Macrocyclic contrast agents in a proven dosage are safe .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4418-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27221561</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain Stem - diagnostic imaging ; Cerebellar Nuclei - diagnostic imaging ; Contrast agents ; Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Globus Pallidus - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Imaging ; Injections, Intravenous ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Longitudinal Studies ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neuro ; Neuroradiology ; Organometallic Compounds - administration &amp; dosage ; Pons - diagnostic imaging ; Population ; Radiology ; Research Design ; Retrospective Studies ; Thalamus - diagnostic imaging ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2017-02, Vol.27 (2), p.772-777</ispartof><rights>European Society of Radiology 2016</rights><rights>European Radiology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-28516a7f809ee707d8ad8559bf2e2d7df40a968770d58578671590474dafec0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-28516a7f809ee707d8ad8559bf2e2d7df40a968770d58578671590474dafec0b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-016-4418-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-016-4418-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27221561$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kromrey, Marie-Luise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liedtke, Kim Rouven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ittermann, Till</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langner, Sönke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsch, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weitschies, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühn, Jens-Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Intravenous injection of gadobutrol in an epidemiological study group did not lead to a difference in relative signal intensities of certain brain structures after 5 years</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Purpose To investigate if application of macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents in volunteers is associated with neuronal deposition detected by magnetic resonance imaging in a 5-year longitudinal survey. Materials and methods Three hundred eighty-seven volunteers who participated in a population-based study were enrolled. Subjects underwent plain T1-weighted brain MRI at baseline and 5 years later with identical sequence parameters. At baseline, 271 participants additionally received intravenous injection of the macrocyclic contrast agent gadobutrol (1.5 mmol/kg). A control group including 116 subjects received no contrast agent. Relative signal intensities of thalamus, pallidum, pons and dentate nucleus were compared at baseline and follow-up. Results No difference in relative signal intensities was observed between contrast group (thalamus, p = 0.865; pallidum, p = 0.263; pons, p = 0.533; dentate nucleus, p = 0.396) and control group (thalamus, p = 0.683; pallidum; p = 0.970; pons, p = 0.773; dentate nucleus, p = 0.232) at both times. Comparison between both groups revealed no significant differences in relative signal intensities (thalamus, p = 0.413; pallidum, p = 0.653; pons, p = 0.460; dentate nucleus, p = 0.751). The study showed no significant change in globus pallidus-to-thalamus or dentate nucleus-to-pons ratios. Conclusions Five years after administration of a 1.5-fold dose gadobutrol to normal subjects, signal intensity of thalamus, pallidum, pons and dentate nucleus did not differ from participants who had not received gadobutrol. Key Points • Gadobutrol does not lead to neuronal signal alterations after 5 years . • Neuronal deposition of macrocyclic contrast agent could not be confirmed . • Macrocyclic contrast agents in a proven dosage are safe .</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain Stem - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cerebellar Nuclei - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Contrast agents</subject><subject>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Globus Pallidus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Injections, Intravenous</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuro</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Organometallic Compounds - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Pons - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Thalamus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcGKFDEURQtRnHb0A9xIwM1sSl9SSSVZyqDjwIAbXRepykuTpjppk9RAz9fMB_gVfpkpexQRBDcJvHfufXBv07yk8IYCyLcZoOugBdq3nFPV3j1qNpR3rKWg-ONmA7pTrdSanzXPct4BgKZcPm3OmGSMip5umm_XoSRziyEumfiww6n4GEh0ZGtsHJeS4lznxASCB29x7-Mct34yM8llsUeyTXE5EOstCbGQGY0lJRJTJ85hwjDhKk84m-JvkWS_DWZ1LBiyLx7zemvCVEzFxrS-uaRlKkuqO-MKJiK-3x_RpPy8eeLMnPHFw3_efPnw_vPlx_bm09X15bubduIgSsuUoL2RToFGlCCtMlYJoUfHkFlpHQejeyUlWKGEVL2kQgOX3BqHE4zdeXNx8j2k-HXBXIa9zxPOswlYcxqoElrU7FX3Hyjre913klb09V_oLi6ppvHTkGslmNKVoidqSjHnhG44JL836ThQGNbWh1PrQ219WFsf7qrm1YPzMu7R_lb8qrkC7ATkugpbTH-c_qfrDzCtu2k</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Kromrey, Marie-Luise</creator><creator>Liedtke, Kim Rouven</creator><creator>Ittermann, Till</creator><creator>Langner, Sönke</creator><creator>Kirsch, Michael</creator><creator>Weitschies, Werner</creator><creator>Kühn, Jens-Peter</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Intravenous injection of gadobutrol in an epidemiological study group did not lead to a difference in relative signal intensities of certain brain structures after 5 years</title><author>Kromrey, Marie-Luise ; Liedtke, Kim Rouven ; Ittermann, Till ; Langner, Sönke ; Kirsch, Michael ; Weitschies, Werner ; Kühn, Jens-Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-28516a7f809ee707d8ad8559bf2e2d7df40a968770d58578671590474dafec0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain Stem - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cerebellar Nuclei - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Contrast agents</topic><topic>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Globus Pallidus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Injections, Intravenous</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuro</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Organometallic Compounds - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Pons - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Thalamus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kromrey, Marie-Luise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liedtke, Kim Rouven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ittermann, Till</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langner, Sönke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsch, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weitschies, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühn, Jens-Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kromrey, Marie-Luise</au><au>Liedtke, Kim Rouven</au><au>Ittermann, Till</au><au>Langner, Sönke</au><au>Kirsch, Michael</au><au>Weitschies, Werner</au><au>Kühn, Jens-Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intravenous injection of gadobutrol in an epidemiological study group did not lead to a difference in relative signal intensities of certain brain structures after 5 years</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>772</spage><epage>777</epage><pages>772-777</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Purpose To investigate if application of macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents in volunteers is associated with neuronal deposition detected by magnetic resonance imaging in a 5-year longitudinal survey. Materials and methods Three hundred eighty-seven volunteers who participated in a population-based study were enrolled. Subjects underwent plain T1-weighted brain MRI at baseline and 5 years later with identical sequence parameters. At baseline, 271 participants additionally received intravenous injection of the macrocyclic contrast agent gadobutrol (1.5 mmol/kg). A control group including 116 subjects received no contrast agent. Relative signal intensities of thalamus, pallidum, pons and dentate nucleus were compared at baseline and follow-up. Results No difference in relative signal intensities was observed between contrast group (thalamus, p = 0.865; pallidum, p = 0.263; pons, p = 0.533; dentate nucleus, p = 0.396) and control group (thalamus, p = 0.683; pallidum; p = 0.970; pons, p = 0.773; dentate nucleus, p = 0.232) at both times. Comparison between both groups revealed no significant differences in relative signal intensities (thalamus, p = 0.413; pallidum, p = 0.653; pons, p = 0.460; dentate nucleus, p = 0.751). The study showed no significant change in globus pallidus-to-thalamus or dentate nucleus-to-pons ratios. Conclusions Five years after administration of a 1.5-fold dose gadobutrol to normal subjects, signal intensity of thalamus, pallidum, pons and dentate nucleus did not differ from participants who had not received gadobutrol. Key Points • Gadobutrol does not lead to neuronal signal alterations after 5 years . • Neuronal deposition of macrocyclic contrast agent could not be confirmed . • Macrocyclic contrast agents in a proven dosage are safe .</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27221561</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-016-4418-z</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0938-7994
ispartof European radiology, 2017-02, Vol.27 (2), p.772-777
issn 0938-7994
1432-1084
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859500383
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain Stem - diagnostic imaging
Cerebellar Nuclei - diagnostic imaging
Contrast agents
Contrast Media - administration & dosage
Diagnostic Radiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Globus Pallidus - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Imaging
Injections, Intravenous
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Longitudinal Studies
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Neuro
Neuroradiology
Organometallic Compounds - administration & dosage
Pons - diagnostic imaging
Population
Radiology
Research Design
Retrospective Studies
Thalamus - diagnostic imaging
Ultrasound
title Intravenous injection of gadobutrol in an epidemiological study group did not lead to a difference in relative signal intensities of certain brain structures after 5 years
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A23%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intravenous%20injection%20of%20gadobutrol%20in%20an%20epidemiological%20study%20group%20did%20not%20lead%20to%20a%20difference%20in%20relative%20signal%20intensities%20of%20certain%20brain%20structures%20after%205%C2%A0years&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Kromrey,%20Marie-Luise&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=772&rft.epage=777&rft.pages=772-777&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-016-4418-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826696371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1854985289&rft_id=info:pmid/27221561&rfr_iscdi=true