Immediate compared with on‐demand maternal full feeding after planned caesarean delivery: a randomised trial
Objective To evaluate immediate compared with on‐demand full maternal oral feeding after caesarean delivery Study design A randomised trial. Setting Obstetric unit of a university hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Population Women admitted for a planned caesarean under spinal anaesthesia. Methods...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2017-01, Vol.124 (1), p.123-131 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
To evaluate immediate compared with on‐demand full maternal oral feeding after caesarean delivery
Study design
A randomised trial.
Setting
Obstetric unit of a university hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Population
Women admitted for a planned caesarean under spinal anaesthesia.
Methods
Participants were randomised to a sandwich meal served immediately on return to the ward or on‐demand.
Main outcome measures
Primary outcomes were patient satisfaction VAS (visual analog scale of 100 mm) on the feeding regimen and vomiting at 24 hours.
Results
453 women were initially enrolled, 395 were randomised and available for analysis. Median (full range) patient satisfaction VAS scores were 82 (15–100) versus 84 (0–100) mm, P = 0.88 and vomiting rates were 1/197 (0.5%) versus 2/198 (1.0%), P > 0.99 for immediate compared with on‐demand feeding, respectively. The immediate versus on‐demand arms first ate at a median of 105 (35–210) versus 165 (45–385) minutes, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1470-0328 1471-0528 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1471-0528.14211 |