Verbal and Numerical Expressions of Probability: “It's a Fifty–Fifty Chance”

When estimating risks, people may use “50” as an expression of the verbal phrase “fifty–fifty chance,” without intending the associated number of 50%. The result is an excess of 50s in the response distribution. The present study examined factors determining the magnitude of such a “50 blip,” using...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Organizational behavior and human decision processes 2000-01, Vol.81 (1), p.115-131
Hauptverfasser: de Bruin, Wändi Bruine, Fischhoff, Baruch, Millstein, Susan G., Halpern-Felsher, Bonnie L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 131
container_issue 1
container_start_page 115
container_title Organizational behavior and human decision processes
container_volume 81
creator de Bruin, Wändi Bruine
Fischhoff, Baruch
Millstein, Susan G.
Halpern-Felsher, Bonnie L.
description When estimating risks, people may use “50” as an expression of the verbal phrase “fifty–fifty chance,” without intending the associated number of 50%. The result is an excess of 50s in the response distribution. The present study examined factors determining the magnitude of such a “50 blip,” using a large sample of adolescents and adults. We found that phrasing probability questions in a distributional format (asking about risks as a percentage in a population) rather than in a singular format (asking about risks to an individual) reduced the use of “50.” Less numerate respondents, children, and less educated adults were more likely to say “50.” Finally, events that evoked feelings of less perceived control led to more 50s. The results are discussed in terms of what they reveal about how people express epistemic uncertainty.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/obhd.1999.2868
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859313660</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749597899928686</els_id><sourcerecordid>48323637</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-66401bcb5374e46acbe587a52e80459d9517e28d882af05b502480eb77cb33e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU2r1DAUhoso3vHq1qUUEXTT8SRp2sSdDPfqlYuKqNuQpKdMhn6ZtBdnN__Brf65-SWmdlARXJy8JDznI-9JkocE1gSgeN6bbbUmUso1FYW4lawISJ5JSeF2soIylxmXpThL7oWwAyCkALibnBEoGIGSrJIPn9Eb3aS6q9K3U4ve2Xi7-Dp4DMH1XUj7On3ve6ONa9y4f5EeD9-vxqch1emlq8f98fDtl6abre4sHg8_7id3at0EfHDS8-TT5cXHzevs-t2rq83L68xyRsasKHIgxhrOyhzzQluDXJSaUxSQc1lJTkqkohKC6hq44UBzAWjK0hrGkLPz5NlSd_D9lwnDqFoXLDaN7rCfgiKCS0ZYUUBEH_-D7vrJd3E6RSkjklExQ-sFsr4PwWOtBu9a7feKgJrNVrPZajZbzWbHhDdLgscB7W8aEXczOagbxbQg8djHoAAQxcWYn4ZZCVeEEbUd21js0WnEybRY_dV7WVUEnpwAHeKOah_tduEPR7ngZRkxsWAYrb9x6FWwDuNmKufRjqrq3f_-8xO5z7P4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223193280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Verbal and Numerical Expressions of Probability: “It's a Fifty–Fifty Chance”</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>de Bruin, Wändi Bruine ; Fischhoff, Baruch ; Millstein, Susan G. ; Halpern-Felsher, Bonnie L.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Bruin, Wändi Bruine ; Fischhoff, Baruch ; Millstein, Susan G. ; Halpern-Felsher, Bonnie L.</creatorcontrib><description>When estimating risks, people may use “50” as an expression of the verbal phrase “fifty–fifty chance,” without intending the associated number of 50%. The result is an excess of 50s in the response distribution. The present study examined factors determining the magnitude of such a “50 blip,” using a large sample of adolescents and adults. We found that phrasing probability questions in a distributional format (asking about risks as a percentage in a population) rather than in a singular format (asking about risks to an individual) reduced the use of “50.” Less numerate respondents, children, and less educated adults were more likely to say “50.” Finally, events that evoked feelings of less perceived control led to more 50s. The results are discussed in terms of what they reveal about how people express epistemic uncertainty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-5978</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2868</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10631071</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Decision making. Choice ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Probability ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Studies ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2000-01, Vol.81 (1), p.115-131</ispartof><rights>2000 Academic Press</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. Jan 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-66401bcb5374e46acbe587a52e80459d9517e28d882af05b502480eb77cb33e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-66401bcb5374e46acbe587a52e80459d9517e28d882af05b502480eb77cb33e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597899928686$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,4010,27900,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1258577$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10631071$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejobhdp/v_3a81_3ay_3a2000_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a115-131.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Bruin, Wändi Bruine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischhoff, Baruch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millstein, Susan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halpern-Felsher, Bonnie L.</creatorcontrib><title>Verbal and Numerical Expressions of Probability: “It's a Fifty–Fifty Chance”</title><title>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</title><addtitle>Organ Behav Hum Decis Process</addtitle><description>When estimating risks, people may use “50” as an expression of the verbal phrase “fifty–fifty chance,” without intending the associated number of 50%. The result is an excess of 50s in the response distribution. The present study examined factors determining the magnitude of such a “50 blip,” using a large sample of adolescents and adults. We found that phrasing probability questions in a distributional format (asking about risks as a percentage in a population) rather than in a singular format (asking about risks to an individual) reduced the use of “50.” Less numerate respondents, children, and less educated adults were more likely to say “50.” Finally, events that evoked feelings of less perceived control led to more 50s. The results are discussed in terms of what they reveal about how people express epistemic uncertainty.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Decision making. Choice</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0749-5978</issn><issn>1095-9920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU2r1DAUhoso3vHq1qUUEXTT8SRp2sSdDPfqlYuKqNuQpKdMhn6ZtBdnN__Brf65-SWmdlARXJy8JDznI-9JkocE1gSgeN6bbbUmUso1FYW4lawISJ5JSeF2soIylxmXpThL7oWwAyCkALibnBEoGIGSrJIPn9Eb3aS6q9K3U4ve2Xi7-Dp4DMH1XUj7On3ve6ONa9y4f5EeD9-vxqch1emlq8f98fDtl6abre4sHg8_7id3at0EfHDS8-TT5cXHzevs-t2rq83L68xyRsasKHIgxhrOyhzzQluDXJSaUxSQc1lJTkqkohKC6hq44UBzAWjK0hrGkLPz5NlSd_D9lwnDqFoXLDaN7rCfgiKCS0ZYUUBEH_-D7vrJd3E6RSkjklExQ-sFsr4PwWOtBu9a7feKgJrNVrPZajZbzWbHhDdLgscB7W8aEXczOagbxbQg8djHoAAQxcWYn4ZZCVeEEbUd21js0WnEybRY_dV7WVUEnpwAHeKOah_tduEPR7ngZRkxsWAYrb9x6FWwDuNmKufRjqrq3f_-8xO5z7P4</recordid><startdate>200001</startdate><enddate>200001</enddate><creator>de Bruin, Wändi Bruine</creator><creator>Fischhoff, Baruch</creator><creator>Millstein, Susan G.</creator><creator>Halpern-Felsher, Bonnie L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200001</creationdate><title>Verbal and Numerical Expressions of Probability: “It's a Fifty–Fifty Chance”</title><author>de Bruin, Wändi Bruine ; Fischhoff, Baruch ; Millstein, Susan G. ; Halpern-Felsher, Bonnie L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-66401bcb5374e46acbe587a52e80459d9517e28d882af05b502480eb77cb33e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Decision making. Choice</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Bruin, Wändi Bruine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischhoff, Baruch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millstein, Susan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halpern-Felsher, Bonnie L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Bruin, Wändi Bruine</au><au>Fischhoff, Baruch</au><au>Millstein, Susan G.</au><au>Halpern-Felsher, Bonnie L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Verbal and Numerical Expressions of Probability: “It's a Fifty–Fifty Chance”</atitle><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle><addtitle>Organ Behav Hum Decis Process</addtitle><date>2000-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>115-131</pages><issn>0749-5978</issn><eissn>1095-9920</eissn><abstract>When estimating risks, people may use “50” as an expression of the verbal phrase “fifty–fifty chance,” without intending the associated number of 50%. The result is an excess of 50s in the response distribution. The present study examined factors determining the magnitude of such a “50 blip,” using a large sample of adolescents and adults. We found that phrasing probability questions in a distributional format (asking about risks as a percentage in a population) rather than in a singular format (asking about risks to an individual) reduced the use of “50.” Less numerate respondents, children, and less educated adults were more likely to say “50.” Finally, events that evoked feelings of less perceived control led to more 50s. The results are discussed in terms of what they reveal about how people express epistemic uncertainty.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10631071</pmid><doi>10.1006/obhd.1999.2868</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-5978
ispartof Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2000-01, Vol.81 (1), p.115-131
issn 0749-5978
1095-9920
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859313660
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Behavior
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition. Intelligence
Decision making. Choice
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Probability
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Studies
Uncertainty
title Verbal and Numerical Expressions of Probability: “It's a Fifty–Fifty Chance”
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A33%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Verbal%20and%20Numerical%20Expressions%20of%20Probability:%20%E2%80%9CIt's%20a%20Fifty%E2%80%93Fifty%20Chance%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Organizational%20behavior%20and%20human%20decision%20processes&rft.au=de%20Bruin,%20W%C3%A4ndi%20Bruine&rft.date=2000-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=115-131&rft.issn=0749-5978&rft.eissn=1095-9920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/obhd.1999.2868&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E48323637%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223193280&rft_id=info:pmid/10631071&rft_els_id=S0749597899928686&rfr_iscdi=true