Verbal and Numerical Expressions of Probability: “It's a Fifty–Fifty Chance”

When estimating risks, people may use “50” as an expression of the verbal phrase “fifty–fifty chance,” without intending the associated number of 50%. The result is an excess of 50s in the response distribution. The present study examined factors determining the magnitude of such a “50 blip,” using...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Organizational behavior and human decision processes 2000-01, Vol.81 (1), p.115-131
Hauptverfasser: de Bruin, Wändi Bruine, Fischhoff, Baruch, Millstein, Susan G., Halpern-Felsher, Bonnie L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:When estimating risks, people may use “50” as an expression of the verbal phrase “fifty–fifty chance,” without intending the associated number of 50%. The result is an excess of 50s in the response distribution. The present study examined factors determining the magnitude of such a “50 blip,” using a large sample of adolescents and adults. We found that phrasing probability questions in a distributional format (asking about risks as a percentage in a population) rather than in a singular format (asking about risks to an individual) reduced the use of “50.” Less numerate respondents, children, and less educated adults were more likely to say “50.” Finally, events that evoked feelings of less perceived control led to more 50s. The results are discussed in terms of what they reveal about how people express epistemic uncertainty.
ISSN:0749-5978
1095-9920
DOI:10.1006/obhd.1999.2868