How We Engage Graduating Professional Students in Interprofessional Patient Safety

Problem Interprofessional curricula on patient safety do not acknowledge the culture and vulnerabilities of the student experience and often do not engage students. Methods We describe a patient safety collaboration between graduating nursing and medical students during their Capstone courses that f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nursing forum (Hillsdale) 2016-10, Vol.51 (4), p.233-237
Hauptverfasser: Stevenson, Eleanor, Chudgar, Saumil M., Turner, Kathleen, Molloy, Margie, Phillips, Beth, Engle, Deborah L., Clay, Alison S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Problem Interprofessional curricula on patient safety do not acknowledge the culture and vulnerabilities of the student experience and often do not engage students. Methods We describe a patient safety collaboration between graduating nursing and medical students during their Capstone courses that fostered conversations about the similarities and differences in professional school experiences around patient safety. Students wrote reflections about an unanticipated patient outcome. Qualitative content analysis was used to characterize themes within student reflections, and to create audience response system questions to highlight differences in each profession's reflections and to facilitate discussion about those differences during the collaboration. Findings Medical students identified events in which perceived patient outcomes were worse than events identified by nursing students. Nursing students identified more near‐miss events. Nursing students positively impacted the event and attributed action to the presence of a clinical instructor and personal responsibility for patient care. Medical students described themselves as “only a witness” and attributed inaction to hierarchy and concern about grades. Conclusions Students felt the session would change their future attitudes and behaviors. Stevenson Chudgar Molloy Phillips Engle Clay
ISSN:0029-6473
1744-6198
DOI:10.1111/nuf.12146