Comparison between ranibizumab and aflibercept for macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion
Purpose We compared the efficacy of bimonthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (IVR) with that of bimonthly intravitreal injections of aflibercept (IVA) in two prospective, consecutive groups of patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Patients and M...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Japanese journal of ophthalmology 2017, Vol.61 (1), p.67-73 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
We compared the efficacy of bimonthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (IVR) with that of bimonthly intravitreal injections of aflibercept (IVA) in two prospective, consecutive groups of patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).
Patients and Methods
Eyes with ME after CRVO received either bimonthly IVR (ranibizumab group;
n
= 13) or IVA (aflibercept group;
n
= 13) injections and were followed monthly for 6 months. Three patients in the ranibizumab group and two in the aflibercept group were lost to follow-up and excluded from the study. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT) on optical coherence tomography, and aqueous vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentrations were evaluated before and after treatment.
Results
From baseline to month 6, significant improvements occurred in mean logMAR BCVA (ranibizumab group: 0.78–0.47;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-5155 1613-2246 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10384-016-0476-7 |