Comparison between ranibizumab and aflibercept for macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion

Purpose We compared the efficacy of bimonthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (IVR) with that of bimonthly intravitreal injections of aflibercept (IVA) in two prospective, consecutive groups of patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Patients and M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Japanese journal of ophthalmology 2017, Vol.61 (1), p.67-73
Hauptverfasser: Saishin, Yoshitsugu, Ito, Yuka, Fujikawa, Masato, Sawada, Tomoko, Ohji, Masahito
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose We compared the efficacy of bimonthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (IVR) with that of bimonthly intravitreal injections of aflibercept (IVA) in two prospective, consecutive groups of patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Patients and Methods Eyes with ME after CRVO received either bimonthly IVR (ranibizumab group; n  = 13) or IVA (aflibercept group; n  = 13) injections and were followed monthly for 6 months. Three patients in the ranibizumab group and two in the aflibercept group were lost to follow-up and excluded from the study. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT) on optical coherence tomography, and aqueous vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentrations were evaluated before and after treatment. Results From baseline to month 6, significant improvements occurred in mean logMAR BCVA (ranibizumab group: 0.78–0.47; p  
ISSN:0021-5155
1613-2246
DOI:10.1007/s10384-016-0476-7