Carcass grading characteristics of serially harvested calf-fed Holstein steers fed zilpaterol hydrochloride

Serial harvests were conducted using Holstein steers ( = 110) fed zilpaterol hydrochloride (ZH) for 0 or 20 d prior to harvest. Steers were harvested in 28-d increments beginning at 254 d on feed (DOF) and ending at 534 DOF. After harvest and a 36-h chill period, carcasses were evaluated using gradi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2016-12, Vol.94 (12), p.5129-5136
Hauptverfasser: May, N D, McEvers, T J, Walter, L J, Reed, J A, Hutcheson, J P, Lawrence, T E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Serial harvests were conducted using Holstein steers ( = 110) fed zilpaterol hydrochloride (ZH) for 0 or 20 d prior to harvest. Steers were harvested in 28-d increments beginning at 254 d on feed (DOF) and ending at 534 DOF. After harvest and a 36-h chill period, carcasses were evaluated using grading methods standard for the United States (USDA), Canada (Canadian Beef Grading Association [CBGA]), and Japan (Japanese Meat Grading Agency [JMGA]). No ZH treatment differences ( = 0.81) were detected for 12th-rib fat thickness; however, additional DOF resulted in a daily linear increase ( < 0.01) of 12th-rib fat thickness by 0.004 cm/d. Longissimus muscle area was increased ( < 0.01) by 8.7 cm with ZH supplementation and linearly increased ( < 0.01) 0.08 cm2/d with additional DOF. Calculated USDA yield grade (YG) decreased ( < 0.01) 0.33 units due to ZH treatment and linearly increased ( < 0.01) 0.009 units/d. Steers supplemented with ZH exhibited increased ( < 0.01) CGBA LM width; however, no difference ( = 0.37) was detected in CGBA LM length. No ZH treatment differences ( = 0.64) were observed for CBGA fat class; however, CGBA fat class linearly increased ( < 0.01) by 0.01 units/d. No ZH differences ( ≥ 0.17) were detected for the CBGA estimated lean percentage or YG equations. Evaluation for JMGA occurs at the sixth and seventh rib interface; LM area was 4.6 cm2 greater ( = 0.02) for cattle supplemented with ZH and linearly increased ( < 0.01) by 0.07 cm2/d with additional DOF. Subcutaneous fat thickness was not different among ZH treatments ( = 0.10) but linearly ( < 0.04) increased ( < 0.01) by 0.005 cm/d with additional DOF using the JMGA grading method. No difference ( ≥ 0.21) was calculated between ZH treatments or DOF for JMGA estimated yield. No ZH treatment differences ( = 0.85) were detected in USDA marbling score; however, marbling linearly increased ( < 0.01) 0.07 units/d. These data illustrate the impact of ZH and increasing DOF on economically important carcass grading outcomes used in the USDA, CBGA, and JMGA grading programs.
ISSN:1525-3163
DOI:10.2527/jas.2016-0837