A comparison between effect of photodynamic therapy by LED and calcium hydroxide therapy for root canal disinfection against Enterococcus faecalis : A randomized controlled trial
Highlights • Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy (aPDT) and calcium hydroxide therapy as auxiliary adjunct methods for common endodontic retreatments displays disinfectant properties. • Efficacy against E.faecalis is better in LED photodynamic therapy compared to calcium hydroxide therapy. • APDT is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy 2017-03, Vol.17, p.226-232 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Highlights • Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy (aPDT) and calcium hydroxide therapy as auxiliary adjunct methods for common endodontic retreatments displays disinfectant properties. • Efficacy against E.faecalis is better in LED photodynamic therapy compared to calcium hydroxide therapy. • APDT is capable of disinfecting the canals in a single visit root canal treatment. This results in a fewer number of visits and less chair time. • Advantages of aPDT with LED over lasers include greater effectiveness due to a broader spectrum, ease and safety of use, affordability and less heat production. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1572-1000 1873-1597 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.12.009 |