Evidence appraisal of Tita ATN, Szychowski JM, Boggess K, et al. Adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis for cesarean delivery.: N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1231-1241
Reading research and incorporating valid research results into practice is a vital part of ensuring that perioperative nursing practice is evidence based. The AORN Research Evidence Appraisal Tools can help perioperative nurses evaluate research. There are three tools for evaluation of the different...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AORN journal 2017-01, Vol.105 (1), p.117-122 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Reading research and incorporating valid research results into practice is a vital part of ensuring that perioperative nursing practice is evidence based. The AORN Research Evidence Appraisal Tools can help perioperative nurses evaluate research. There are three tools for evaluation of the different types of evidence: the Research Evidence Appraisal TooleStudy, the Research Evidence Appraisal TooleSummary, and the Non-Research Evidence Appraisal Tool. These tools are used to evaluate the evidence upon which AORNs guidelines are based. The tools can be used to appraise the level of evidence and quality of evidence for a single research study, a summary of multiple research studies, or non-research evidence. Each section of the tool is discussed to help readers understand why the study received a particular appraisal score and what that rating means to perioperative nursing practice. Clinical judgment should be used to determine whether the ndings of an individual study are of value and relevance in a particular setting or patient care situation. Individuals intending to put this studys ndings into practice are encouraged to review the original article to determine its applicability to their setting. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-2092 1878-0369 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.aorn.2016.11.014 |