Effect of Anatomic Changes on Pencil Beam Scanned Proton Dose Distributions for Cranial and Extracranial Tumors
Purpose To estimate the frequency and impact of anatomic changes on the delivered dose in pencil beam scanning proton therapy, to assess the need for repeat CT scanning and adaptive replanning. Methods and Materials A total of 730 patients treated at Paul Scherrer Institut between 2007 and 2014 were...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2017-03, Vol.97 (3), p.616-623 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose To estimate the frequency and impact of anatomic changes on the delivered dose in pencil beam scanning proton therapy, to assess the need for repeat CT scanning and adaptive replanning. Methods and Materials A total of 730 patients treated at Paul Scherrer Institut between 2007 and 2014 were included in this study, for which the number of patients who had control CT scans and who were replanned as a result of anatomic changes was analyzed. For those that were replanned, the nominal dose distributions (originally optimized on the planning CT scan) were recalculated on the replanning CT scan and differences evaluated using standard dose metrics for planning target volumes and clinical target volumes and organs at risk (OARs). Results Control CT studies were acquired for 244 patients (33.5%), and replanning was deemed clinically necessary for 40 (16%) of these (5.5% of the total cohort). The OARs and target dose differences between the nominal and recalculated dose distributions were found to be strongly dependent on the subgroup of patients. Nevertheless, dose differences were found to be ≤ 5% for 88% of all analyzed OARs, and planning target volume/clinical target volume V95% was reduced by ≤5% in 87%/90% of cases. Conclusions Despite anatomic variations, clinically delivered plans have been found to be robust to anatomic changes, with replanning being deemed necessary in only a small number of cases. However, because the dosimetric effect of such changes can be quite large for some cases, they have to be monitored and evaluated on an individual basis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0360-3016 1879-355X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.013 |