Temporal change of myocardial tissue character is associated with left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

Abstract Background Prognostic significance of temporal change in myocardial tissue characterization by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has not been elucidated in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Methods and results Sixty-eight patients with newly-diagnosed DCM who un...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiology 2017-08, Vol.70 (2), p.185-191
Hauptverfasser: Nabeta, Takeru, MD, PhD, Inomata, Takayuki, MD, PhD, FJCC, Fujita, Teppei, MD, Iida, Yuichiro, MD, Ikeda, Yuki, MD, PhD, Sato, Takanori, MD, Ishii, Shunsuke, MD, PhD, Maekawa, Emi, MD, PhD, Mizutani, Tomohiro, MD, PhD, Naruke, Takashi, MD, PhD, Koitabashi, Toshimi, MD, PhD, Inoue, Yusuke, MD, PhD, Ako, Junya, MD, PhD, FJCC
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Prognostic significance of temporal change in myocardial tissue characterization by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has not been elucidated in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Methods and results Sixty-eight patients with newly-diagnosed DCM who underwent CMR including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) both at baseline and during follow-up period were enrolled. LGE score was defined by a signal intensity of ≥5 standard deviations above the remote reference myocardium mean. Left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) defined as a LV ejection fraction increase of ≥10% and a decrease in indexed LV end-diastolic diameter of ≥10% compared to those at baseline was detected in 38% of the patients. There was no significant difference in LGE score between baseline and follow-up (5.8% vs. 7.3%; p = 0.38). The change in LGE area (delta-LGE) was significantly lower in patients with LVRR than those without (−0.5% ± 3.4% vs. 3.0 ± 7.4%; p = 0.02). On the other hand, T2 ratio during the follow-up significantly reduced (1.95 ± 0.48 vs. 1.67 ± 0.56; p < 0.01); however, there was no significant difference in the change in T2 ratio between patients with LVRR and those without (−0.29 ± 0.73 vs. −0.27 ± 0.66; p = 0.88). Multivariate logistic analysis indicated that baseline LGE score [odds ratio; 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.90; p < 0.01] together with delta-LGE (odds ratio; 0.77; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92; p = 0.01) were independently associated with subsequent LVRR ( p < 0.01). Conclusions The temporal change of LGE-CMR score during the clinical course was significantly correlated with following LVRR.
ISSN:0914-5087
1876-4738
DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.10.017