Survival Benefit and Cost Savings From Compliance With a Simplified 3-Hour Sepsis Bundle in a Series of Prospective, Multisite, Observational Cohorts
OBJECTIVES:To determine mortality and costs associated with adherence to an aggressive, 3-hour sepsis bundle versus noncompliance with greater than or equal to one bundle element for severe sepsis and septic shock patients. DESIGN:Prospective, multisite, observational study following three sequentia...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical care medicine 2017-03, Vol.45 (3), p.395-406 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVES:To determine mortality and costs associated with adherence to an aggressive, 3-hour sepsis bundle versus noncompliance with greater than or equal to one bundle element for severe sepsis and septic shock patients.
DESIGN:Prospective, multisite, observational study following three sequential, independent cohorts, from a single U.S. health system, through their hospitalization.
SETTING:Cohort 1five tertiary and six community hospitals. Cohort 2single tertiary, academic medical center. Cohort 3five tertiary and four community hospitals.
PATIENTS:Consecutive sample of all severe sepsis and septic shock patients (definedinfection, ≥ 2 systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and hypoperfusive organ dysfunction) identified by a quality initiative. The exposure was full 3-hour bundle compliance. Bundle elements are as follows1) blood cultures before antibiotics; 2) parenteral antibiotics administered less than or equal to 180 minutes from greater than or equal to two systemic inflammatory response syndrome “and” lactate ordered, or less than or equal to 60 minutes from “time-zero,” whichever occurs earlier; 3) lactate result available less than or equal to 90 minutes postorder; and 4) 30 mL/kg IV crystalloid bolus initiated less than or equal to 30 minutes from “time-zero.” Main outcomes were in-hospital mortality (all cohorts) and total direct costs (cohorts 2 and 3).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Cohort 15,819 total patients; 1,050 (18.0%) bundle compliant. Mortality604 (22.6%) versus 834 (26.5%); CI, 0.9–7.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.72; CI, 0.61–0.86; p value is less than 0.001. Cohort 21,697 total patients; 739 (43.5%) bundle compliant. Mortality99 (13.4%) versus 171 (17.8%), CI, 1.0–7.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; CI, 0.44–0.80; p value is equal to 0.001. Mean costs$14,845 versus $20,056; CI, –$4,798 to –5,624; adjusted β, –$2,851; CI, –$4,880 to –822; p value is equal to 0.006. Cohort 37,239 total patients; 2,115 (29.2%) bundle compliant. Mortality383 (18.1%) versus 1,078 (21.0%); CI, 0.9–4.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.84; CI, 0.73–0.96; p value is equal to 0.013. Mean costs$17,885 versus $22,108; CI, –$2,783 to –5,663; adjusted β, –$1,423; CI, –$2,574 to –272; p value is equal to 0.015.
CONCLUSIONS:In three independent cohorts, 3-hour bundle compliance was associated with improved survival and cost savings. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-3493 1530-0293 |
DOI: | 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002184 |