Interspecific reproductive barriers between sympatric populations of wild tomato species (Solanum section Lycopersicon)
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Interspecific reproductive barriers (IRBs) often prevent hybridization between closely related species in sympatry. In the tomato clade (Solanum section Lycopersicon), interspecific interactions between natural sympatric populations have not been evaluated previously. In this s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of botany 2016-11, Vol.103 (11), p.1964-1978 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | PREMISE OF THE STUDY:
Interspecific reproductive barriers (IRBs) often prevent hybridization between closely related species in sympatry. In the tomato clade (Solanum section Lycopersicon), interspecific interactions between natural sympatric populations have not been evaluated previously. In this study, we assessed IRBs between members of the tomato clade from nine sympatric sites in Peru.
METHODS:
Coflowering was assessed at sympatric sites in Peru. Using previously collected seeds from sympatric sites in Peru, we evaluated premating prezygotic (floral morphology), postmating prezygotic (pollen‐tube growth), and postzygotic barriers (fruit and seed development) between sympatric species in common gardens. Pollen‐tube growth and seed development were examined in reciprocal crosses between sympatric species.
KEY RESULTS:
We confirmed coflowering of sympatric species at five sites in Peru. We found three types of postmating prezygotic IRBs during pollen–pistil interactions: (1) unilateral pollen‐tube rejection between pistils of self‐incompatible species and pollen of self‐compatible species; (2) potential conspecific pollen precedence in a cross between two self‐incompatible species; and (3) failure of pollen tubes to target ovules. In addition, we found strong postzygotic IRBs that prevented normal seed development in 11 interspecific crosses, resulting in seed‐like structures containing globular embryos and aborted endosperm and, in some cases, overgrown endothelium. Viable seed and F1 hybrid plants were recovered from three of 19 interspecific crosses.
CONCLUSIONS:
We have identified diverse prezygotic and postzygotic IRBs that would prevent hybridization between sympatric wild tomato species, but interspecific hybridization is possible in a few cases. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9122 1537-2197 |
DOI: | 10.3732/ajb.1600356 |