Evaluation of proton pump inhibitor use on treatment outcomes with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir in a real‐world cohort study

Many patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) are on prolonged proton‐pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and wish to remain on PPI therapy once treatment for HCV starts. A preliminary report recently suggested decrease rates of sustained virological response (SVR) for patients taking concomitant PPI...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2016-12, Vol.64 (6), p.1893-1899
Hauptverfasser: Tapper, Elliot B., Bacon, Bruce R., Curry, Michael P., Dieterich, Douglas T., Flamm, Steven L., Guest, Lauren E., Kowdley, Kris V., Lee, Yoori, Tsai, Naoky C., Younossi, Zobair M., Afdhal, Nezam H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Many patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) are on prolonged proton‐pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and wish to remain on PPI therapy once treatment for HCV starts. A preliminary report recently suggested decrease rates of sustained virological response (SVR) for patients taking concomitant PPI and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF). We sought to determine the effect of PPI use on the rate of SVR in a real‐world cohort of 1,979 patients with chronic HCV treated with LDV/SOF. We collected clinical data and pharmacy dispensing records on patients taking 8, 12, or 24 weeks of LDV/SOF ± ribavirin (RBV). The primary outcome was sustained virological response at 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12) in a per‐protocol analysis in order to determine the effect of PPI use adjusted for confounders. Statistical adjustment was performed in propensity‐matched analysis. Among treatment completers, SVR12 was achieved in 441 (97.1%) of PPI recipients compared with 1,497 (98.2%) in PPI nonrecipients (P = 0.19). Neither low‐ nor high‐dose PPI was associated with decreased SVR, although patients taking twice‐daily PPI achieved a lower SVR12 rate (91.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 77.0‐97.0; P = 0.046). After propensity matching for PPI use, there were no significant associations between SVR12 and any dose or frequency of PPI use. However, in a sensitivity analysis focusing on patients with cirrhosis, twice‐daily PPI use was associated with lower odds ratio for SVR12 (0.11; 95% CI, 0.02‐0.59). Conclusion: These data from a cohort of real‐world patients receiving hepatitis C antibody therapy with LDF/SOF ± RBV support the prescription labeling suggesting that patients take no more than low‐dose (20‐mg omeprazole equivalents) PPI daily. (Hepatology 2016;64:1893‐1899).
ISSN:0270-9139
1527-3350
DOI:10.1002/hep.28782