Metabolic syndrome in adolescents: definition based on regression of IDF adult cut-off points

Abstract Objectives The objective of this study was to derive a sex- and age-specific definition of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its abnormalities for adolescents. Study design This is a cross-sectional study. Methods A total of 1100 adolescent students, aged 12–18 y, were randomly selected fro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public health (London) 2016-12, Vol.141, p.88-94
Hauptverfasser: Benmohammed, K, Valensi, P, Balkau, B, Lezzar, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objectives The objective of this study was to derive a sex- and age-specific definition of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its abnormalities for adolescents. Study design This is a cross-sectional study. Methods A total of 1100 adolescent students, aged 12–18 y, were randomly selected from schools and classrooms in the city of Constantine, Algeria; all had anthropometric measurements taken, and 989 had blood tests. Gender-specific growth curves for components of the MetS were derived, using the LMS (lambda-mu-sigma) method, and the percentiles corresponding to the thresholds of the MetS components proposed for adults by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) were identified. Results The prevalence of the MetS using this new definition was 4.3% for boys and 3.7% for girls ( P  = 0.64). Overall, a high waist circumference was the most frequent of the syndrome components, but the frequency was much higher in girls than that in boys, 33.6% and 6.9%, respectively. In contrast, a high systolic blood pressure was seen in 26.8% of the boys and only 11.4% of the girls. The prevalence of the MetS was higher among adolescents with a body mass index (BMI) ≥95th percentile of the study population, 28.8%, against 9.8% in adolescents with a BMI between the 95th and 85th percentile and 1.8% in those with a BMI
ISSN:0033-3506
1476-5616
DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2016.09.001