A General Framework for the Aggregation Model of Coexistence

1. The aggregation model of coexistence has been used widely to explain the coexistence of competing species that utilize patchy and ephemeral resources. Over the years, it has been reformulated in many different ways, using different assumptions, indices and analyses, leading sometimes to contradic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of animal ecology 2002-07, Vol.71 (4), p.651-662
Hauptverfasser: Hartley, Stephen, Shorrocks, Bryan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:1. The aggregation model of coexistence has been used widely to explain the coexistence of competing species that utilize patchy and ephemeral resources. Over the years, it has been reformulated in many different ways, using different assumptions, indices and analyses, leading sometimes to contradictory conclusions. We present a general framework, from which many of the alternative approaches are derived as special cases. 2. A generalized distribution, composed of the distribution of visits across patches and the distribution of eggs per visit, is used to model changes in the mean individual-level experience of density that occur at different population-level densities. 3. New and more general criteria for coexistence are derived, based upon standard invasability analysis of Lotka-Volterra competition equations applied to a patchy system. 4. An important parameter in the new coexistence criteria is the mean per capita density of individuals in a single clutch (c*). Until now this measure has been relatively ignored, experimentally and theoretically. 5. We confirm earlier findings that the random distribution of clutches may be a sufficient cause of aggregated egg distributions to allow coexistence between species of unequal competitive ability, but only if the product of competition coefficients is less than one.
ISSN:0021-8790
1365-2656
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00628.x